--000000000000e2fe6e05f31f14b8 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e2fe6c05f31f14b7" --000000000000e2fe6c05f31f14b7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable how about 1:30 PT on Tuesday? A bit late for Tim but should work. On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 3:24 PM John McColman wrote: > Hi Alexa, > > > > This time doesn=E2=80=99t work unfortunately. > > > > I have time EARLY, or later (whatever time may work for you after 11 PST. > > > > Wednesday? I may have time to =E2=80=9Cescape=E2=80=9D in the afternoon t= o have a call. > Please let me know. > > > > *John McColman* > > In Front Marketing > > > > 403.861.9727 > > *john@infrontmarketing.ca * > > > > > > > > > > *From: *Alexa Graziani > *Date: *Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 4:20 PM > *To: *John McColman > *Cc: *Timothy Thomas > *Subject: *Re: Report - Calgary > > > > We could do 11:30am PT on Tuesday but are booked up outside of that. Does > that time work? > > > > And yes, the quarterly report every 3 months and the monthly report in th= e > 2 months in between works for me to start with. > > > > So Jan =3D quarterly report, Feb and march - monthly reports, April > =3Dquarterly report. > > > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 2:43 PM John McColman > wrote: > > Hi Alexa, > > > > I like this approach. We need time for the new report as I want to align > Oct =E2=80=93 Dec (Q4). Can we move the meeting to Tuesday? Or maybe Wedn= esday AM > but I=E2=80=99m gone Wed 11am MST =E2=80=93 Friday (wife=E2=80=99s 40th b= irthday). Returning on > Monday the 6th. > > > > The request for a 30/30 comparison and then 90/90 is doable. I like the > idea of having a time scheduled each month for it. Do you want 2 monthly > reports and then the quarterly comparison? > > > > IE: > > Q4 Review VS Q3 =E2=80=93 once every 3 months. > > MoM =E2=80=93 2 months. > > > > I=E2=80=99m ok with 48 hour for review before a meeting. If we scheduled = a call > for Thursday/Friday, I would deadline my team for a Monday EOD delivery. > > > > Would this work? Or would we want 3 MoM comparisons and 1 quarterly? > Either work for IFM. > > > > One last thing. Did we want to separate the markets MoM and then one larg= e > report Quarterly? > > > > We will make this a priority. > > > > Thank you, > > > > *John McColman* > > In Front Marketing > > > > 403.861.9727 > > *john@infrontmarketing.ca * > > > > > > > > > > *From: *Alexa Graziani > *Date: *Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 9:57 AM > *To: *John McColman > *Cc: *Timothy Thomas > *Subject: *Re: Report - Calgary > > > > Hi John, > > > > I thought prior to the holidays, what we talked about was using the same > structure but because we were so close to the holidays waiting to do the > rest of them until January and doing a Q4 review (Oct-Dec) instead. And > that all of the other markets would be completed and sent at least 48 hou= rs > before our hour long call so that Tim and I could review them all ahead o= f > time. Since we only have