Re: Ontario entities for amalgamation [Attorney Client Communication]

From
Nina Kani <nkani@thekey.com>
To
Tammi Franzese <tammi.franzese@thekey.com>
CC
Timothy Thomas <tt@thekey.com>
Date
Mon, 2 Dec 2024 16:41:05 -0800
Folder
INBOX
--Apple-Mail-B4231CDB-9E81-46D5-943F-21DE0D647D19 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I a= m not familiar with the practice of using two IDs for payroll purposes. Tim,= can you provide some background? &nbsp;Let=E2=80=99s discuss by phone. I ca= n speak tomorrow and then I am OOO until Monday. On Dec 2, 2024, at 2:19=E2=80=AFPM, Tammi Franzese &= lt;tammi.franzese@thekey.com&gt; wrote: =EF=BB=BF Hi T= im, Our attorney is asking for more infor= mation to answer your question -&nbsp; As for Ontario, can you plea= se confirm which entities Tim is speaking of? There are three Ontario entiti= es: &nbsp; SJD Care Services Inc. Arya Healthy Living Inc. Arya Healthy Living Oakville Inc. &nbsp; = I am not familiar with how Tim is utilizing two companies= to work around overtime regulations. If Tim requires two separate employer e= ntities to accomplish this, then we will need to leave one of the entities o= ut of the amalgamation. It would make sense to exclude the entity that condu= cts the business that the remaining subsidiaries do not conduct. Would this b= e the augmented staffing business? I believe you said one of the entities= is SJD. What&nbsp;is the other entity?&nbsp; Which entity does augmented staffing? our attorney thinks that is the en= tity that&nbsp;should not be included in the amalgamation if you want to con= tinue as before re overtime.&nbsp; @Nina Kani &nbsp;&nbsp;Do you agree&nbsp;that the augme= nted staffing entity should not be included in the amalgamation? <div c= lass=3D"gmail_default" sty

Thread (1)