--000000000000a06bce062f9ad44a Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yes, we should be proceeding with any cost reductions we identify. As long as HR is involved and supporting the process. On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 8:23=E2=80=AFAM Timothy Thomas wrote= : > Good morning, > > I'm following up. Should this be a priority? > > Thanks > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 11:47=E2=80=AFAM Timothy Thomas w= rote: > >> Hi Melissa, >> >> I'm scoping out my options for reducing on-call costs in Canada. Is it >> safe to assume that I could proceed with a RIF in order to achieve this? >> Working through the details with HR now. >> >> Thanks >> Tim >> >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> From: Kathryn Nester >> Date: Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 11:45=E2=80=AFAM >> Subject: Re: Re: June Lapointe >> To: >> Cc: , >> >> >> Hi Tim, >> >> I spoke with Irin about what severance would look like for June in the >> event of a RIF and she said we would owe her $932.25 which is an average= of >> her bi-weekly salary based on her last 3 years of employment. >> >> In addition to this we would also owe any applicable pay in lieu of >> notice and vacation accruals. >> >> Are you just looking at costs right now or is this RIF confirmed? Steve >> with the Legal team would like to loop in our Canadian legal counsel but >> not before we know we are moving forward with this. >> >> Thank you, >> >> Kathryn Nester >> HR Business Support Team >> >> If you require immediate assistance, please contact the HR Service Cente= r >> at 1.888.874.8088 >> >> On Thu, Feb 27 4:17 PM , Kathryn wrote: >> Hi Tim, >> >> I understand, I will look into this and get back to you >> >> thanks, >> Kathryn >> >> On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 4:03=E2=80=AFPM Timothy Thomas w= rote: >> >> Hi Kathryn, >> >> I've been tasked with reducing our on-call expenditure and we may need t= o >> eliminate Junes position and merge the Montreal and Toronto markets for >> on-call. >> >> Could you please work with your team on identifying the cost of >> termination. It would be classified as a reduction in force. >> >> Thanks! >> >> -- >> >> *Tim Thomas* >> Head of Midwest & Canada Divisions | *TheKey* >> Mobile: 514.591.9387 >> [image: TheKey] >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> *Kathryn Nester* >> HR Generalist | TheKey >> Mobile: 647.932.5787 >> >> >> >> I am in the Eastern Time Zone and am sending this email at a time that >> suits my work schedule; please do not feel obligated to reply outside of >> your working hours. >> >> >> >> >> >> [#CASE-158992]:424188:fs >> > --=20 *Melissa Reyes* President of Client Services(916)743-0530 --000000000000a06bce062f9ad44a Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yes= , we should be proceeding with any cost reductions we identify. As long as = HR is involved and supporting the process. On We= d, Mar 5, 2025 at 8:23=E2=80=AFAM Timothy Thomas < tt@thekey.com > wrote: Good morning,=C2=A0 = I'm following up. S