--0000000000001e9bbd05feab72ad Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Confirming that the policy was verbally reviewed on the Canada pipeline call today and that the policy was sent to all corp/field Canada team members via Docusign for acknowledgement. The HRSC is tracking acknowledgements through the deadline of 6/30/2023. Thank you! Jennifer On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 9:28=E2=80=AFAM Timothy Thomas wrot= e: > Great. Thank you. > > On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 12:21=E2=80=AFPM Jennifer Allen wrote: > >> Hi Tim, >> >> Steve and I remain aligned that you are good to move forward today. >> >> Angie/Tim, I've added this to the document review list if you'd like >> outside counsel to review. I'll put it on our next agenda. >> >> Jennifer A. >> >> On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 7:24=E2=80=AFAM Timothy Thomas w= rote: >> >>> Good morning. >>> >>> We were planning to present the new vacation policy at today's pipeline >>> meeting. Should we postpone? >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 12:46=E2=80=AFPM Steve Koyanagi >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks, everyone. My assumption is that we're 90% there with this >>>> policy as far as compliance, but there are likely a few technical item= s in >>>> each province that we need to account for. As mentioned by Jennifer, i= f >>>> rolling it out this week is a top priority we should do so. >>>> >>>> We have the option to concurrently have outside counsel review if we >>>> want to assess additional compliance concerns. I'd estimate the review >>>> would take an additional 2-3 weeks and likely cost 3-5k for a thorough >>>> review. >>>> >>>> Happy to discuss further. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 9:20=E2=80=AFAM Angie Markwell >>> angie.markwell@thekey.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> How long a delay and how much to use outside counsel? >>>>> >>>>> Sent from Angie's iPhone >>>>> >>>>> On Jun 20, 2023, at 11:51 AM, Timothy Thomas wrote: >>>>> >>>>> =EF=BB=BF >>>>> Personally I don't see any legal issues with this policy as it was >>>>> built upon previous franchise policies that were already reviewed by >>>>> council. Ultimately Steve's call. >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 11:48=E2=80=AFAM Jennifer Allen >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Angie, >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes, from the comments I do see she did review the original version. >>>>>> The big differences are: >>>>>> >>>>>> - Moved from weekly to daily time allotments >>>>>> - Allowing for people to use time (as approved by leadership) >>>>>> after the 90 day probationary period >>>>>> - Requiring a "1 week (5 day)" rollover year over year >>>>>> - Rolled Nova Scotia employees into a higher accrual for the 6%/3 >>>>>> weeks if they get to 5 years (previously 8 years until they would= have been >>>>>> eligible for those amounts. >>>>>> >>>>>> Jennifer >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 6:07=E2=80=AFAM Angie Markwell >>>>> angie.markwell@thekey.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Let me ask did Shameema review this way back when we started throug= h >>>>>>>