--00000000000052ce6605f31edfec Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000052ce6305f31edfeb" --00000000000052ce6305f31edfeb Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable We could do 11:30am PT on Tuesday but are booked up outside of that. Does that time work? And yes, the quarterly report every 3 months and the monthly report in the 2 months in between works for me to start with. So Jan =3D quarterly report, Feb and march - monthly reports, April =3Dquarterly report. On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 2:43 PM John McColman wrote: > Hi Alexa, > > > > I like this approach. We need time for the new report as I want to align > Oct =E2=80=93 Dec (Q4). Can we move the meeting to Tuesday? Or maybe Wedn= esday AM > but I=E2=80=99m gone Wed 11am MST =E2=80=93 Friday (wife=E2=80=99s 40th b= irthday). Returning on > Monday the 6th. > > > > The request for a 30/30 comparison and then 90/90 is doable. I like the > idea of having a time scheduled each month for it. Do you want 2 monthly > reports and then the quarterly comparison? > > > > IE: > > Q4 Review VS Q3 =E2=80=93 once every 3 months. > > MoM =E2=80=93 2 months. > > > > I=E2=80=99m ok with 48 hour for review before a meeting. If we scheduled = a call > for Thursday/Friday, I would deadline my team for a Monday EOD delivery. > > > > Would this work? Or would we want 3 MoM comparisons and 1 quarterly? > Either work for IFM. > > > > One last thing. Did we want to separate the markets MoM and then one larg= e > report Quarterly? > > > > We will make this a priority. > > > > Thank you, > > > > *John McColman* > > In Front Marketing > > > > 403.861.9727 > > *john@infrontmarketing.ca * > > > > > > > > > > *From: *Alexa Graziani > *Date: *Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 9:57 AM > *To: *John McColman > *Cc: *Timothy Thomas > *Subject: *Re: Report - Calgary > > > > Hi John, > > > > I thought prior to the holidays, what we talked about was using the same > structure but because we were so close to the holidays waiting to do the > rest of them until January and doing a Q4 review (Oct-Dec) instead. And > that all of the other markets would be completed and sent at least 48 hou= rs > before our hour long call so that Tim and I could review them all ahead o= f > time. Since we only have an hour, we only have about 10 mins to discuss > each market, which is why I want to review them ahead of time instead of > walking through each one on the call. > > > > So for the next deliverable, I'd like all markets besides Calgary in the > date range of Oct-Dec (compared to the previous period) sent ideally 48 > hours ahead of when we meet (since there will be a lot of data to digest)= . > If Matthew needs more time to do this, we can push our next call by a few > days. > > > > I think this is also a good time to align on timing/reporitng moving > forward. I'd like to schedule an hour long call each month to review each > market with you and Tim. I'd like the report in the same structure