--000000000000848e9f0624ff3748 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000848e9e0624ff3747" --000000000000848e9e0624ff3747 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Great! I'm happy this is launching. This is comprehensive data. My only comments would be: 1. adding a disclaimer similar to the one about the fridge (i.e., fridge was opened 9 times, it doesn't mean the person was eating or drinking but is often a good indication of nutrition...) for sleep too unless there is a sensor actually tracking their sleep (do we know she was actually asleep for 8 hrs 45 nin or just quiet and in bed) 2. it would be a good idea to run this all by Steve or Nina from a liability perspective to know if any of hte wording around falls/.risk needs to change 3. weekly summary is cut off; if it's sent by email and they can scroll won't be an issue 4. this one is a bigger considerations: one of the big issues older adults have with this type of technology is that they feel that it's obtrusive so that is where it becomes a judgement call of how much data makes sense to share depending on the cognitive ability of the client, whether the family has health authority etc. I can see a situation where a client is upset about this level of data around toileting, fridge, time spent indoors being shared. Would these get uploaded into wellsky too? On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 6:15=E2=80=AFAM Timothy Thomas wrot= e: > Hi Shadi, > > Our first few lifeguard clients are up and running in Montreal. It took a > little longer that we anticipated to get everything set up. That said, I'= d > like you to review the attached template of our Weekly Wellness Report. > Once a client has had the system installed and a baseline is established, > they will receive this report from their care manager. > > Please let me know what you think and if you have any recommendations. > Thanks! > TIm > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: Kara Sehl > Date: Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 1:14=E2=80=AFPM > Subject: Version 2.0 of Weekly Wellness Report & Emergency Escalation > To: Timothy Thomas > Cc: Nathanial Findlay , Amanda Mansfield amansfield@joinlifeguard.com>, Steven Ferguson sferguson@joinlifeguard.com> > > > Hi Tim, > > > > As we discussed, I=E2=80=99ve attached the latest weekly report for you a= nd Dr. > Shadi to review. > > > > I=E2=80=99ve also attached the current escalation process for Montreal. > > > > During today=E2=80=99s meeting, we discussed who would be responsible for= calling > 911 in the following scenarios. We need to determine what to do if we lan= d > on step 8. > > > > *Scenario 1: The occupant is alone during a fall* > > 1. A fall is detected, and the occupant is alone. > 2. Lifeguard Alert Center (LAC) is notified. > 3. The LAC agent calls the first emergency contact =E2=80=93 no answer= . > 4. The agent calls the second emergency contact =E2=80=93 no answer. > 5. The agent calls the third emergency contact =E2=80=93 no