--0000000000007e2da6062d820742 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable As long as Nina is good with it, so am I. :-) Just need to work through offer letter, tracking etc. once we land on a path forward. *Emily Russell* SVP Human Resources | *TheKey* On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 5:46=E2=80=AFPM Michele Boehmer wrote: > Hi Emily. > > Nina, Derek and I met a few minutes ago and we are thinking of bringing o= n > 1 CSM (salaried) and 1 scheduler (hourly) and then bringing the other 2 > into a transitional consultant role (like a contractor or a salaried temp > position). I am connecting with Timothy and Sharon to make sure we are > aligned on the team members to keep. Do you have any concerns about > proceeding this way? > > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 3:41=E2=80=AFPM Emily Russell > wrote: > >> Nina- >> >> Can we offer them salaried temp positions (duration of 60 days) so we >> don=E2=80=99t have to walk down the path of position eliminations / seve= rance? >> >> >> *Emily Russell* >> SVP Human Resources | *TheKey* >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 5:02=E2=80=AFPM Michele Boehmer >> wrote: >> >>> As this is time sensitive, I wanted to get this to the top of your >>> inbox. These 4 individuals have been working this week to help with the >>> transition with the understanding that they will be compensated by us. = Can >>> we regroup on how we will proceed? I'd like to give them some answers = and >>> we really need them for this transition. Let me know what works for >>> everyone to connect. >>> >>> Thanks >>> Michele >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>> From: Michele Boehmer >>> Date: Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 10:15=E2=80=AFAM >>> Subject: Re: Victoria - Temp Employees >>> To: Nina Kani >>> Cc: Emily Russell , Melissa Reyes >> melissa.reyes@thekey.com> >>> >>> >>> After further work with the 4 employees of Victoria and working with >>> Sharon on the transition, I am concerned about this solution. 3 of the= 4 >>> are currently exempt and having them as hourly employees, even short te= rm, >>> will be cost prohibitive. While I understand that we are not looking t= o >>> commit long term to these team members, Can we bring them on as regular >>> employees like we have done with past acquisitions and then make staff >>> adjustments over time as needed? >>> >>> Please let me know if you have time to discuss as we need to move quick= ly >>> >>> Thanks >>> Michele >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 2:41=E2=80=AFPM Nina Kani wro= te: >>> >>>> OK, if they are hired hourly, they will need to track their hours and >>>> be paid per hour for the work performed (not certain if their hourly r= ate >>>> is different for caregiving vs. office work), including overtime for h= ours >>>> worked beyond a standard workweek. Hourly employees can be full-time o= r >>>> part-time, and they may be eligible for benefits like paid holidays an= d >>>> overtime pay and of course they have to be paid for the minimum wage i= n the >>>> provi