--0000000000000728040633625810 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000072803063362580f" --000000000000072803063362580f Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Teio, Please see the email below regarding the Ceridian implementation of this change with a sensitive deadline. Will you please assist at your earliest convenience? Thank you, Tammi Franzese Senior Corporate Paralegal | TheKey Mobile: 813.521.5269 Germaine Daniels Thu, Apr 17, 2:29=E2=80=AFPM (5 days ago) to *Steve*, *Nina*, *Michael*, *Timothy*, eclark, Geraldine, alyson.rohane, Laszlo, me Hi Team, I'm providing an update on the Ceridian implementation. During our discussion today with our Ceridian implementation representative, it was emphasized that we must provide the new entity name and CRA number by April 30, 2025, with a strict deadline of May 2, 2025, to meet the go-live date of July 1, 2025. The representative stated that failure to meet the May 2, 2025, deadline would prevent Ceridian from accommodating a mid-year conversion, necessitating a conversion date of January 1, 2026. Furthermore, adhering to the May 2, 2025, deadline will result in a waiver of the $1,000 implementation fee per new account for the setup of eight new accounts, saving us a total of $8,000. The representative will also work to match our current cost per payroll processing per account. How should we handle PTO? Since the employees are terming from one entity to another, should their PTO balances be paid out or transferred to the new entity? Thanks, *Germaine Daniels* Director Payroll | TheKey Email: germaine.daniels@thekey.com Mobile: 562.784.1800 On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 2:23=E2=80=AFPM Teio Senda wrot= e: > Hi Tammi, > > > > We won=E2=80=99t have any proof of the amalgamation until the amalgamatio= n > actually occurs. We will provide the certificate of amalgamation at that > point. Parties are typically satisfied on the basis that they will receiv= e > this certificate of amalgamation following closing. > > > > To be clear, there is no *assignment* of any contracts resulting from the > amalgamation. I want that to be clear so that the proper messaging is > provided to third-parties. > > > Regards, > > > Teio > > > > *From:* Tammi Franzese > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 9, 2025 11:20 AM > *To:* Leslie Westmoreland > *Cc:* Teio Senda ; Steve Koyanagi skoyanagi@thekey.com>; Geraldine Nath ; > Germaine Daniels ; Timothy Thomas tt@thekey.com>; Nina Kani > *Subject:* Re: Canada Amalgamation [CWILSON-C.FID2144802] > > > > Hi Leslie, > > > > The clarification was helpful, as well as the Table of Corporate Names. I= 'll > get this signed and returned to you soon. > > > > We've been asked to show proof of the amalgamation by a government entity > in response to our 90-day notice of assignment. What do you suggest we se= nd > at this point since the amalgamation isn't finalized? > > > > *Thank you,* > > *Tammi Franzese* > > Senior Corporate Paralegal | *