--0000000000009491bf060f1446bc Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks Tim I will update and recirculate, can you please verify the employees that would go into this role? On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 1:20=E2=80=AFPM Timothy Thomas wrot= e: > Yes this will work provided we remove the supervision roles including thi= s > section: > > Supervising the provision of after-hours support for our clients and > caregivers (including evenings and > weekends) =E2=80=93 this support may include email, telephone and/or home= visits. > When needed, stepping in to > cover on-call rotations for Staffing Managers. > > My recommended title would be: Employee Care Manager > > On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 12:19=E2=80=AFPM Dawn Kellerman > wrote: > >> Tim >> >> Can you please look at the attached, would this work if we removed the >> Caregiver Manger supervision piece? >> >> Is there anything else that needs to be added/edited? >> >> We need to determine the right title, but if we can get this to a workin= g >> document for you to meet your needs, we can determine what makes sense. >> >> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 9:49=E2=80=AFAM Timothy Thomas w= rote: >> >>> No, that would not be my intention. I would still want all roles to >>> report to the GM. >>> >>> After meeting Christa this morning and chatting about the compliance >>> requirements of our Ambassadors, I do think it's important that their J= Ds >>> include the nuances between US and Canadian roles. >>> >>> For example, this line in the caregiver manager JD: Work closely with >>> our Workers' Compensation team to ensure compliance with all workers' >>> compensation laws and regulations. In Canada the ambassadors manager >>> workers comp claims themselves and interface with the various provincia= l >>> labour boards. >>> >>> All to say, I think we can launch with the caregiver manager JD as long >>> as we make a commitment to tweak this moving forward. >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 9:37=E2=80=AFAM Dawn Kellerman >>> wrote: >>> >>>> We are discussing this role this afternoon, using this JD, the >>>> Ambassadors would be supervisors to the Caregiver Managers and not rep= ort >>>> to the GM, is that the intention? >>>> >>>> Once this is approved to move forward, it has to be built in Workday, >>>> before any offers can be sent. We also do not have an incentive plan b= uilt >>>> for this role, meaning it would need to go through the exec team, comp= & >>>> finance for financial modeling >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 9:31=E2=80=AFAM Timothy Thomas = wrote: >>>> >>>>> However it would be in support of the Caregiver Managers, not staffin= g >>>>> managers. >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 9:30=E2=80=AFAM Timothy Thomas wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Audra, >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes this JD would definitely work better for our ambassadors. @Dawn >>>>>> Kellerman is it too late to make a change? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 3:38=E2=80=AFPM Audra Williams (via Google D= ocs)