--000000000000886ff8062df2f059 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000886ff7062df2f057" --000000000000886ff7062df2f057 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Tim, I have 2 concerns regarding the caregiver offer letter. I emailed a few months ago about there being no mention of the $25 deduction fee for the employee background check in the offer letter. This issue only relates to Montreal since no other Canadian market does it. However, we ran into a problem with it since we didn't disclose it at the beginning. I've attached the background check mention of both the old and new contracts below. The second concern is about the non-solicitation section. On the old contract, it mentioned the specific penalty about what would happen if they "stole" one of our clients. The current contract does not mention this, only that it is not allowed but no mention of consequences. I've attached the non-solicitation section from both the current one and the old HCA one. Please let me know if there's anything to be done so we can covered in case more problems come up. Thank you, -- Melissa Rus *Recruteur / Recruiter * *_________________* TheKey- Soins =C3=A0 Domicile: Montr=C3=A9al, QC Daughterly Companions: Pennsylvania Alpine HomeCare: Pennsylvania Tel: 514.907.5065 ext: 4 mrus@thekey.com | TheKey.ca [image: TheKey] --000000000000886ff7062df2f057 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Tim,=C2=A0 I have 2 conce= rns regarding the caregiver offer letter.=C2=A0 I = emailed a few months ago about there being no mention of the $25 deduction = fee for the employee background check in the offer letter. This issue only = relates to Montreal since=C2=A0no other Canadian market does it. However, w= e ran into a problem with it since we didn't disclose it at the beginni= ng. I've attached the background=C2=A0check mention of both the old and= new contracts below.=C2=A0 The second concern is = about the non-solicitation section. On the old contract, it mentioned the s= pecific penalty about what would happen if they "stole" one of ou= r clients. The current contract does not mention this, only that it is not = allowed but no mention of consequences.=C2=A0 I've attached t= he non-solicitation section from both the current one and the old HCA one.= =C2=A0 Please let me know if there's anything = to be done so we can covered=C2=A0in case more problems come up.=C2=A0 Thank you,=C2=A0 -- Melissa Rus Recruteur / Recruiter _________________ The= Key- Soins =C3=A0 Domicile: Montr=C3=A9al, QC Daughterly Companions: Pennsylvania = <p style=3D"line-height:1.656;margin-top:0pt;m