--0000000000001d71b005ee12fa12 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001d71af05ee12fa11" --0000000000001d71af05ee12fa11 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Tim, Just back from PTO today. On the resolution, is Chantal saying she's unwilling to move forward unless we modify? Preference is to just push this forward rather than having to redo. I'm okay with the other proposed change so if they can finalize the contract then good on my end. On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 7:58 AM Timothy Thomas wrote: > Hi Steve and Mike, > > Please see Chantal's comments on your changes to the agreement - Thanks > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: Chantal Larouche > Date: Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 9:02 AM > Subject: GP Conceptal Service Contract commented (HCA) > To: Timothy Thomas , Tim Thomas > Cc: Micha=C3=ABlla Bouchard-Racine > > > Bonjour =C3=A0 vous deux, I trust all is well and that you had a very n= ice > weekend. > > > > Attached and below are the comments from my attorney for your > consideration in order to amend your file in good order. Thank you both > and have a good day! > > > > Chantal > > > > *De :* Micha=C3=ABlla Bouchard-Racine > *Envoy=C3=A9 :* 17 novembre 2022 10:27 > *=C3=80 :* Chantal Larouche > *Cc :* Denis Villeneuve > *Objet :* Re: Documents recus pour ma signature de HCA TR: R=C3=A9solutio= n > re=C3=A7u de HCA (Home Care Assistance) > > > > Good morning, > > > I have reviewed the submitted documents regarding the resolution and the > contract between GPC and HCA. > > > I notice that the resolution still states =E2=80=9CThat the *consulting* > agreement=E2=80=A6=E2=80=9D. As previously mentioned, the contract is not= exclusively a > consulting agreement, it is also a management one. This is an important > distinction in order to respect section 139.1 of the Charter of the Frenc= h > language, which clearly states that a company can only be represented to > the office by a *member of management.* > > > This sentence in the resolution could therefore lead to the impossibility > for Ms. Larouche to act on behalf of and represent HCA with the OQLF, > despite the contract and the rest of the resolution. > > > I made one comment in the margin of the Contract (attached), where I > believe the original version should be kept as is for the purpose of > respecting section 139.1. Apart from that, the proposed changes are fine. > > > The Confidentiality Agreement is okay as it is. > > > I remain available for any questions. > > > Warm regards, > > > > > > Micha=C3=ABlla Bouchard-Racine > > *Avocate, LL. B. J.D.* > > > > =E2=96=80=E2=96=80=E2=96=80=E2=96=80=E2=96=80=E2=96=80=E2=96=80=E2=96=80= =E2=96=80=E2=96=80=E2=96=80=E2=96=80=E2=96=80=E2=96=80=E2=96=80=E2=96=80=E2= =96=80=E2=96=80=E2=96=80=E2=96=80=E2=96=80=E2=96=80=E2=96=80=E2=96=80=E2=96= =80=E2=96=80=E2=96=80=E2=96=80=E2=96=80 > *GREY CASGRAIN s.e.n.c.* > 4920 boulevard de Maisonneuve Ouest > Bureau 305 > Montr=C3=A9al, Qu