--0000000000000f346a06164b9428 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Timothy, The data came from SF exports. We mapped only the existing zip codes for counties/states and did not check if all existing zip codes were present so that you could remove/add those that are missing or no longer serviced. There are over 875k zip codes in Canada and roughly 10k in SF. What would be the best way to identify the important missing ones? On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 4:06=E2=80=AFPM Timothy Thomas wrot= e: > Hi Ray, > > The list that was provided to us last week is missing postal codes from > our corporate territories. What source are you using to identify the code= s? > > As for Halifax, this should not be a priority. We're not in a position to > service clients there at the moment. > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 9:49=E2=80=AFAM Ray Smale = wrote: > >> Good morning Tim, >> I read this and I'm not sure what it means in terms of direction for the >> team as to what post codes should be in or out. >> Sorry. Could you please clarify... >> >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> From: Timothy Thomas >> Date: Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 9:01=E2=80=AFAM >> Subject: Re: Updated zip codes for SF >> To: Chad Everitt >> >> >> Hi Chad, >> >> 1) Phil asked me to provide a postal code for testing the new web form. = I >> selected one at random by googling Calgary postal codes and it was not >> listed included in Phil=E2=80=99s data. >> >> When we audited the postal code list last week, we only checked to make >> sure the codes listed were within our territory. I didn=E2=80=99t think = to make >> sure that some may have been omitted. >> >> 2) We dont actively service any clients in Halifax nor are we doing any >> marketing. When the Boston client first arrived we thought we could >> leverage the staff there to service other clients. We were unsuccessful. >> >> That said, we do still have a Halifax page on the website but we have no= t >> received an inquiry. >> >> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 9:19=E2=80=AFAM Chad Everitt >> wrote: >> >>> Below is the response I received from Tim re: Canada. Confirming we did >>> close the Charleston and Columbia, SC office and those zip codes should >>> have been removed. >>> >>> >>> *Chad Everitt* >>> President- East Division & Canada >>> Mobile: 202.262.8318 >>> [image: TheKey] >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>> From: Timothy Thomas >>> Date: Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 9:01=E2=80=AFAM >>> Subject: Re: Updated zip codes for SF >>> To: Chad Everitt >>> >>> >>> Hi Chad, >>> >>> 1) Phil asked me to provide a postal code for testing the new web form. >>> I selected one at random by googling Calgary postal codes and it was no= t >>> listed included in Phil=E2=80=99s data. >>> >>> When we audited the postal code list last week, we only checked to make >>> sure the codes listed were within our territory. I didn=E2=80=99t think= to make >>> sure that some may have been omitted. >>> >>> 2) W