--Apple-Mail-2DB8D14C-FE52-4FEE-ADCB-A74675A35205 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Good to go. =20 Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: > From: Rebecca Howe > Date: February 4, 2022 at 2:21:19 PM EST > To: Ken Citron > Cc: Chuck Leu , Chen Xie , Julie Fletcher > Subject: Re: CCM Incentive Plan >=20 > =EF=BB=BF > hiya - I can meet with him. >=20 > BW, Rebecca >=20 >> On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 10:40 AM Ken Citron wrote: >> Great. Let=E2=80=99s move forward as proposed. I will advise Tim. Who= can he connect with on detailed process? >>=20 >>=20 >> Sent from my iPhone >>=20 >>>> On Feb 4, 2022, at 12:06 PM, Rebecca Howe wrote: >>>>=20 >>> =EF=BB=BF >>> Hiya, >>>=20 >>> I would propose that we use the USD equivalent for Canadian offices and t= hen we can support this immediately. >>> In CAD, the $5k client would be a $6,250k CAD client. They would also ge= t the USD equivalents for payouts ($50 US =3D $62.50 CAD). >>>=20 >>> BW, Rebecca >>>=20 >>>> On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 8:59 AM Chuck Leu w= rote: >>>> I would agree that we would be more standard after Q1. No objections t= o having this for Q1 if we can leverage the existing process for reporting a= nd payment. =20 >>>>=20 >>>> Thanks, >>>>=20 >>>> Chuck >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>> On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 10:50 AM Ken Citron wrote: >>>>> Adding Rebecca.=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> As long as we can administer I would like to add Canada to Tim=E2=80=99= s proposed plan and then have them into the new corporate plan when it launc= hes >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> Can Tom leverage existing process for reporting and payment? >>>>>=20 >>>>> Let me know. =20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>>=20 >>>>>>> On Feb 4, 2022, at 11:35 AM, Chen Xie w= rote: >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>> =EF=BB=BFKen =E2=80=94 I don=E2=80=99t know nearly as much about Cana= da as you at this point so I=E2=80=99ll defer this to your judgment with HR=E2= =80=99s support on the short-term best decision =E2=80=94 call me if you nee= d a sounding board. Ultimately though, when HR re-designs, Canada should abs= olutely participate in that plan. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> Chen >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> On Feb 4, 2022, at 11:20 AM, Julie Fletcher wrote: >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> Chuck can weigh in. We just have been focusing on Regl/GM plans for q= 1 rollout and capturing input on SM/CCM for beginning of q2. It will likely n= ot be radically different but try to better align metrics w key KPIs. He cou= ld stay as is for rest of q1 and switch over w rest of HCA.=20 >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 8:15 AM Ken Citron wrote: >>>>>>>> What will the plan be? No need for it to be unique unless there a= re metrics needed that we don=E2=80=99t have for Canada (should not be the c= ase). Also how similar to below? >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> If 4/1 is a hard date we will make and the new plan is dissimilar I= will hold the below request to reduce confusion. =20 >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> Let me know. Including Chen for comment