Re: Report - Calgary

From
John McColman <john@infrontmarketing.ca>
To
Alexa Graziani <agraziani@thekey.com>
CC
Timothy Thomas <tt@thekey.com>
Date
2023-01-25 22:43:05
Folder
INBOX
--_004_YT4PR01MB9671B17641B8D28C806F9E11D7CE9YT4PR01MB9671CANP_ Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_YT4PR01MB9671B17641B8D28C806F9E11D7CE9YT4PR01MB9671CANP_" --_000_YT4PR01MB9671B17641B8D28C806F9E11D7CE9YT4PR01MB9671CANP_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Alexa, I like this approach. We need time for the new report as I want to align Oc= t =96 Dec (Q4). Can we move the meeting to Tuesday? Or maybe Wednesday AM b= ut I=92m gone Wed 11am MST =96 Friday (wife=92s 40th birthday). Returning o= n Monday the 6th. The request for a 30/30 comparison and then 90/90 is doable. I like the ide= a of having a time scheduled each month for it. Do you want 2 monthly repor= ts and then the quarterly comparison? IE: Q4 Review VS Q3 =96 once every 3 months. MoM =96 2 months. I=92m ok with 48 hour for review before a meeting. If we scheduled a call f= or Thursday/Friday, I would deadline my team for a Monday EOD delivery. Would this work? Or would we want 3 MoM comparisons and 1 quarterly? Either= work for IFM. One last thing. Did we want to separate the markets MoM and then one large = report Quarterly? We will make this a priority. Thank you, John McColman In Front Marketing 403.861.9727 john@infrontmarketing.ca From: Alexa Graziani Date: Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 9:57 AM To: John McColman Cc: Timothy Thomas Subject: Re: Report - Calgary Hi John, I thought prior to the holidays, what we talked about was using th= e same structure but because we were so close to the holidays waiting to do= the rest of them until January and doing a Q4 rev External (agraziani@thekey.com ) Report This Email<https://protection.inkyphishfence.com/report?id=3DbmV0b= 3JnMzQyODEyMC9qb2huQGluZnJvbnRtYXJrZXR