--000000000000aae5a005dfde021c Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000aae59f05dfde021b" --000000000000aae59f05dfde021b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To be honest, I've really lost track of what is going on in this thread. Can you outline the current state and then the future state that you're proposing one more time? It might be easiest to set up a call for next week after we've had a chance to review that. Thanks, On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 1:53 PM John McColman wrote: > Hi James, > > > > I would say consolidate Calgary into the rest of them (if a transfer is > available). > > > > Then the same in analytics. Google Analytics, moving the property (G3 & > G4) over into HCA so everyone has eyesight. > > > > However, I have provided access to both GTM & GA that we=E2=80=99re using= , so if > this is easier, we can keep it, as is. > > > > *John McColman* > > In Front Marketing > > Results Driven Performance Marketing > > > > 403.861.9727 > > *john@infrontmarketing.ca * > > Suite 401 =E2=80=93 255 17 Ave SW, Calgary, AB > > > > [image: > https://images2.imgbox.com/4f/28/0CulP3sT_o.png] > [image: > https://images2.imgbox.com/86/7d/UEdGNfFZ_o.png] > > > > > > *From:* James Sudimak (Support) > *Sent:* May 25, 2022 11:13 AM > *To:* John McColman > *Cc:* Timothy Thomas ; Alexa Graziani agraziani@thekey.com>; Jonathan Pytell > *Subject:* Re: Google Tag Manager > > > > Hi John M, > > May you clarify exactly which GTM accounts you want to consolidate? All > Canadian accounts? Only Calgary? > > We'd like to ensure everything is easy and organized moving forward, but > our only concern is not touching the non-Canadian GTM accounts. Do want t= o > do too much or over-complicate anything. > > Thanks and warm regards, > > James Sudimak > Web Developer, TheKey > thekey.com > 221 Main St #520 , > San Francisco, CA 94105 > > > On May 23, 2022, 11:13 AM, James Sudimak wrote: > > Hi Alexa / / Johnathan / Timothy, > > Please see John McColman's response below regarding the CA GTM accounts. > > We could move forward with John's suggestion to consolidate, but also > don't want to over-complicate things. I know we have lots of other non-CA > GTM containers as well that shouldn't be touched, so I believe our curren= t > setup works for us (and perhaps Cardinal). What do you think? > > =E2=80=94 > > *John's response below:* > > *Looping back on this. There were old accounts in GTM, so we=E2=80=99ve r= epurposed > an older tag GTM-P5WP75X, and everything is set up now.* > > *James, the team and I have talked about amalgamating accounts to ensure > that your team has everything under one roof.* > > *This means using the Calgary GTM that=E2=80=99s in the folder that the r= est of > them live.* > > *This also means, the access I gave you for Calgary=E2=80=99s G3/4 is mov= ed over > to your main account with the rest.* > > *If we want to do this, let me know. We can work together and get > everything in plac