This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_005A_01DA7AB3.78AED7B0 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="----=_NextPart_001_005B_01DA7AB3.78AED7B0" ------=_NextPart_001_005B_01DA7AB3.78AED7B0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_002_005C_01DA7AB3.78AED7B0" ------=_NextPart_002_005C_01DA7AB3.78AED7B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yes. I=E2=80=99m aware of Vancouver. It=E2=80=99s been off for the = past 3 months. I=E2=80=99m hoping to do a deep dive into why that is = this month before we start close again. I was thinking it=E2=80=99s the = accruals, but the past 2 months were overstated. And our AR rec is in = balance maybe plus or minus $5000 here and there.=20 =20 =20 =20 From: Timothy Thomas =20 Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2024 10:10 AM To: Daniel Barakat Cc: Kartik Sheth Subject: Re: Margin reviews =20 Same goes for Vancouver. I'm seeing 80k over GP report. =20 On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 9:50=E2=80=AFAM Daniel Barakat = > wrote: Sorry to clarify, the revenue is overstated in netsuite, not the Gross = Profit =20 On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 9:44=E2=80=AFAM > wrote: Hi Tim. I remember Kartik discussing Calgary=E2=80=99s revenue with me, = and looping him in. I didn=E2=80=99t quite iron out the format I want = to start sending you monthly when I did Calgary, but in some of the = latest files I included the Clearcare Revenue to see where we stand. So = this is what I=E2=80=99ll be sending you in the future. If you have any = other suggestions or anything else you=E2=80=99d like to see, let me = know. =20 @Kartik Shethare you able to identify = why Clearcare=E2=80=99s gross profit is overstated by $40k? December = was understated by $58k. Was there some kind of catch up? =20 From: Timothy Thomas >=20 Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2024 9:19 AM To: Daniel Barakat > Subject: Re: Margin reviews =20 Hi Daniel, =20 Looks like the revenue for Calgary is overstated relative to the gross = profit, by nearly 40k. Thoughts? =20 On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 10:35=E2=80=AFAM Timothy Thomas > wrote: Got it. I remember now, let's do that. Thanks =20 On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 10:30=E2=80=AFAM Daniel Barakat = > wrote: Hi Tim. =20 Yes. In one of our calls, that's why I suggested bumping up the accrual = to $15k a month so we can cover ourselves in case we aren't able to make = any prior changes at the end of the year. And if we over-accrue, we can = take the credit back which would be better than taking a hit because we = didn't accrue enough =20 On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 10:27=E2=80=AFAM Timothy Thomas > wrote: Thanks Daniel. I'll over these today and send you my comments. =20 For the EHT in Vancouver, does that mean we're slightly under accruing = at 8k / month? =20 On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 10:14=E2=80=AFAM Daniel Barakat = > wrote: Hi Tim. One quick update. We just paid the EHT for Jan and Feb and it = was $26k. So for Vancouver expect an expense of $18,417 since we = accrued $8