--0000000000006fa3c6063804a015 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006fa3c6063804a014" --0000000000006fa3c6063804a014 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Will do. @Shawntel Sousa I'll set something up for us next week to briefly review before we touch base with Amanda M. in PandaDoc. I want to make sure that the CAD CCA versions I have are what is actually in use at the moment. Thank you, Tammi Franzese Senior Corporate Paralegal | TheKey Mobile: 813.521.5269 On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 12:52=E2=80=AFPM Timothy Thomas wro= te: > Please confirm the final change and I'll advice all my GMs > > Thanks! > > On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 12:24=E2=80=AFPM Steve Koyanagi > wrote: > >> Good with me. Tim before implementing the change we will want to make >> sure your teams are all aware. >> >> On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 9:16=E2=80=AFAM Tammi Franzese >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Steve, >>> >>> I sure will. Do we want to make that change to all Canadian CCAs so >>> they're consistent? >>> >>> Thank you, >>> >>> Tammi Franzese >>> >>> Senior Corporate Paralegal | TheKey >>> >>> Mobile: 813.521.5269 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 11:44=E2=80=AFAM Steve Koyanagi >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Good on my end. Tammi, can you work with Pandadoc and Shawntel as >>>> needed? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 1:23=E2=80=AFPM Shawntel Sousa >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> This is what I was also thinking. >>>>> >>>>> *Respectfully, * >>>>> >>>>> *Shawntel Sousa, LPN* >>>>> >>>>> Client Success Manager | TheKey >>>>> >>>>> Mobile: 403-305-6588 Office: 403-301-3777 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 2:21=E2=80=AFPM Tammi Franzese >>>> tammi.franzese@thekey.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Would it help if we add something to the current signature block tha= t >>>>>> makes it clear where to sign? The first line is meant to be a signat= ure >>>>>> line. We could revise it to say Signature of Client or Authorized Ag= ent. >>>>>> I'm thinking it would be helpful to have a Printed Name line underne= ath the >>>>>> signature line since it's often difficult to read the signature and = that >>>>>> can be especially difficult when it's someone other than the client >>>>>> signing. Then we can move "Self or Relationship to Client" to the ri= ght >>>>>> box. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thoughts? >>>>>> >>>>>> [image: image.png] >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you, >>>>>> >>>>>> Tammi Franzese >>>>>> >>>>>> Senior Corporate Paralegal | TheKey >>>>>> >>>>>> Mobile: 813.521.5269 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 3:27=E2=80=AFPM Timothy Thomas wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I was curious about her comment on the signature box. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "There is a box for them to print their name but not signature, our >>>>>>> agreements are the same. There=E2=80=99s a box to either print or s= ign but >>>>>>> shouldn=E2=80=99t it be both. It=E2=80=99s not always the client si= gning. I could be >>>>>>> wron