--00000000000025d75706423a393e Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Rosemary, Thanks for the email. On #1, the addendum is in Pandadoc and ready for use. I am working with @Au= dra Williams in Tim's absence so we should be good to go there. On #2, given the structure of our contract and Panadadoc system it is unlikely we will be able to to incorporate the addendum into the actual agreement. On #3, I'll connect with Tim when he's back and we will circulate some potential dates asap and will include Melissa. Let me know if there are any additional questions. Thanks! On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 11:19=E2=80=AFAM Rosemary Kelly wrote: > Hi Steve.... > Hope this finds you well. > > I'm touching base as a follow-up from our last discussion. Could you giv= e > me an update on the following: > > > 1. The Lifeguard addendum for Canada - you and your team had mentioned > that there were some minor changes to the Chicago addendum as Canada h= ad > some specific language that needed to be included. What is the status= of > this? > 2. Incorporating the addendum into TheKey consent - I know this is > taking a broader review on your end - any progress? > 3. Lastly and probably the most important - is setting some time to > begin the construct of the master services agreement. As mentioned, w= e > want this to be done by 1/1/26 so we start the new year with an agreem= ent > that covers the rest of the United States. Could we set a date to beg= in > these discussions so we can work on the items that need to be addresse= d? > > > On the last point - Nat has reached out to Melissa as well to make sure w= e > are all in sync for a 1/1/26 start. > > Please let me know if you want to hop on a call this week to discuss. > > Thanks much, > Rosemary > > > > Rosemary M. Kelly > Chief Financial Officer > Lifeguard Health > 949-510-2832 (cell) > --00000000000025d75706423a393e Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Rosemary, Thanks fo= r the email.=C2=A0 On #1, the addendum is in Panda= doc and ready for use. I am working with=C2=A0 @Audra Williams =C2=A0in Tim's absence so we should be good to g= o there. On #2, given the structure of our contrac= t and Panadadoc system it is unlikely=C2=A0we will be able to to incorporat= e the addendum into the actual agreement. On #3, I= 'll connect with Tim when he's back and we will circulate some pote= ntial dates asap and will include Melissa. Let me = know if there are any additional questions. Thanks!=C2=A0 On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 11:19=E2=80=AFA= M Rosemary Kelly < rkelly@joi= nlifeguard.com > wrote: Hi Steve.... Hope this finds you well. I'm touching base as a follow-up from our last discussion.=C2=A0 Could = you give me an update on the following: The Lifeguard addendum for Canada - you and your= team had mentioned that there were some minor changes to the Chicago adden= dum as Canada had some specific language t