--0000000000009f646c05e1fd7104 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Please review and let me know if anything jumps out so i can respond. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Benjamin Lewis Date: Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 12:20 AM Subject: Re: Client Start Pricing Exceptions To: Tad Smith Cc: Brian Scott , Angie Markwell , Chen Xie , Melissa Reyes , Aileen Ruffin , David Durbin , Melissa Reyes , Tad Smith , Mitch Belitz Hello all, The tracking spreadsheet has been updated with last week's data: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1dGnrZ6lUYwLL7rk8KLePG7uSU6Rb09MfhFS= lWAxyhYc/edit?usp=3Dsharing The amount of pay associated without associated billing (excluding house accounts with zero revenue) remained relatively flat week over week ($18,609 vs $17,988, +3.4%). These are the five largest accounts with these transactions from last week: Week of Shift Date Division Name Division Leader Business Unit Patient Id Client Name Sum of Caregiver Expense 13-June N East Angie Markwell Alpine 3368777 Barbara & John Foley $666 13-June N California Chen Xie Craig Cares 5499041 Alicia Hall $606 13-June Southwest Melissa Reyes Orange County 4705496 Nancy Nakamura $484 13-June S East David Durbin South Carolina 4803198 Walter "Blackie" Cook $450 13-June Central Aileen Ruffin Fort Worth 5772001 Leroy Leddon $443 I did receive feedback on a couple of the cases that there were a few shifts that hadn't been closed out due to the time of the data being pulled. Moving forward, I will publish this information on Tuesdays to minimize this, but we are planning to review this data in the Executive Team meeting tomorrow, so I wanted to ensure you all had some amount of time to review beforehand. I look forward to any additional feedback make this as actionable as possible for you and your teams. On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 5:22 PM Benjamin Lewis wrote: > Hello all, > > I have updated the tracking spreadsheet here with last week's data: > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1dGnrZ6lUYwLL7rk8KLePG7uSU6Rb09Mfh= FSlWAxyhYc/edit?usp=3Dsharing > > To help try to narrow down the pay with no bill data, I have filtered out > all clients who do not have revenue booked against them and will include > them in a separate tab moving forward. It seems to have reduced the amoun= t > of house accounts included in the dataset drastically. Hopefully this > change gives you and your teams better visibility into any exceptions mad= e > to pay out shifts without any associated revenue. > > Please let me know if there is any additional feedback on how we can focu= s > the data even more to get you what you need when it comes to visibility o= n > price. > > Best, > Ben > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 9:52 AM Tad Smith wrote: > >> I agree with Brian. We will not have unexplained or invisible leaks in >> our pricing regime. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Jun 7, 2022, at 09:51, Brian Scott wrote: >> >> =EF=BB=BF >> It is to create visibility. Like