--00000000000014646b05b6396e9a Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Tim, Timothy, Sorry, it sounds like our attorneys were also looking for clarification on a point or two so let's just go ahead with a touchpoint call with the three or four of us (Matt may be able to join). How is Monday 2pm EST? In addition to the points I flagged above, attorneys are looking for clarification of intention for the proposed post-close BS adjustments language. E.g., What reimbursements or refunds you might be expecting? Perhaps we can discuss as well on Monday. Have a restful weekend everybody. On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 9:22 PM Tim Thomas wrote: > Thanks Lucas. Sounds good. > > Tim Thomas > Soins =C3=A0 Domicile / Home Care Assistance > 514 907 5065 > > On Dec 9, 2020, at 8:06 PM, Lucas Motro > wrote: > > =EF=BB=BF > Ok, great. Yes, operationally things have been a bit more difficult again > over here with an increase in the number of potential exposures, too, but > we are working through. > > For the order of operations, let us go ahead and have our attorneys flip > this back and then we can all hop on the phone. We will revert back. > > Best, > Lucas > > On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 4:10 PM Timothy Thomas > wrote: > >> Hi Lucas, >> >> I think a conversation around those two points, the holdback and NWC, >> were what we had in mind as well. The rest we can leave to our respectiv= e >> attorneys to iron out. >> >> Yes cases are on the rise here once again and the government is on the >> verge of mandating a lockdown over the holidays so we'll see how that pl= ays >> out. Senior facilities are experiencing outbreaks which is keeping us on >> our toes. >> >> Let me know what day and time works best for you guys. >> >> Regards, >> Tim >> >> On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 3:33 PM Lucas Motro >> wrote: >> >>> Tim and Timothy, >>> >>> Thanks, received. Matt and I are not experts on on the legal side. Woul= d >>> you like us to have our attorneys review first or was there something t= hat >>> you wanted to go ahead and discuss beforehand? >>> >>> Initial reaction is that the Holdback is all or nothing and we're not >>> sure why the NWC target is so low, but other than those two we don't se= e >>> any business oriented points that should cause issues on our end (our >>> attorneys will probably have some others, I'm sure, but that is after a >>> quick skim on our end). >>> >>> On the franchise exhibit, your attorney may be right, so we can pass on >>> his note and have our attorneys re-review it for you. The intent is >>> certainly not to cease operations - it is just to close the franchise >>> agreement in the right way as you convert to corporate. Again, we'll pa= ss >>> on his note and get back to you there. >>> >>> Separately, everything going ok up there? I have seen that the cases ar= e >>> rising again in Canada, as they have been in the US, but haven't read >>> anything about Montreal specifically. >>> >>> Best, >>> Lucas >>> >>>