=?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Final_Review_=E2=80=93_Marketing_Materials_=26_FAQ_Updat?= =?UTF-8?Q?es?=

From
Kay Rossbach <kay.rossbach@thekey.com>
To
Timothy Thomas <tt@thekey.com>
CC
Emma Zumsen <emma.zumsen@thekey.com>, Meighen Fitzpatrick <meighen.fitzpatrick@thekey.com>
Date
Fri, 16 May 2025 09
Folder
INBOX
--0000000000002a424906354147e4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hey Tim, I wasn't the original designer who laid out these documents, so I can only make a couple assumptions about what the thought process was there. I would guess that the brochure is supposed to be laid out as a trifold brochure, and not a booklet brochure. I honestly couldn't fathom a guess as to why it was originally laid out with separate pages like that, maybe a different printer had asked for some specific formatting for their workflow? For the brochure, I see two solutions: 1. I combine all the pages into a trifold brochure so the printer can print that. I don't think this will take much time to reformat for. 2. If you're dedicated to a booklet, then we can plan for that. If we do that, we'll need to provide 2 more pages for printing like the printer said, since you need to have page counts in multiples of 4. Those two pages could be anything, but likely will have to go through another couple review rounds. On the Leave Behind, I don't see any issues with reformatting it to a standard page size. I should be able to get you a resized version early next week. Thanks, Kay On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 3:05=E2=80=AFPM Timothy Thomas wrot= e: > Hi Kay / Meighen > > Would it be possible to lay out these documents in such a way that makes > them better suited for printing? See the comments below from our printer. > > Thanks > Tim > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: > Date: Wed, May 14, 2025 at 4:03=E2=80=AFPM > Subject: RE: Final Review =E2=80=93 Marketing Materials & FAQ Updates > To: Timothy Thomas > > > Hi Tim, > > > > For the =E2=80=9CLeave Behind=E2=80=9D I would recommend that you use a s= tandard size, > 8.5x11, flat sheet, dbl. sided. Or is there a reason that you want a cust= om > size of 9x11.5? > > > > For the brochure, we can do an 8.5x11 folded in half and stapled in the > middle. However, right now you have 6 pages, which means you would have 2 > empty pages. Doesn=E2=80=99t make sense. Maybe there is a reason=E2=80=A6= You might want to > check with the person who designed the brochure. > > > > Feel free to call me if you need further explanation. > > > > *Silvana Stoesser* > > Xentas Inc. > > > > *Mobile: *403-481-0547 > > *Web:* *www.xentas.ca * > > *Email:* silvana@xentas.ca > > > > *From:* Timothy Thomas > *Sent:* May 14, 2025 12:37 PM > *To:* silvana@xentas.ca > *Subject:* Re: Final Review =E2=80=93 Marketing Materials & FAQ Updates > > > > Could you recommend the ideal layout? Folded would be my preference. Than= ks > > > > On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 2:21=E2=80=AFPM wrote: > > Hi Tim, > > > > Thanks for your request. > > Can you please tell me the final size? > > And are they just flat sheets or are they going to be folded? > > > > Thanks, > > > > *Silvana Stoesser* > > Xentas Inc. > > > > *Mobile: *403-481-0547 > > *Web:* *www.xentas.ca * > > *Email:* silvana@xentas.ca > > > > *From:* Timothy Thomas >

Thread (1)