--00000000000062d88d05f9d8334a Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Good morning, Steve. Let us get back to you. Best regards, Matt Matt Vijayan, B.Sc., MBA, CCPE Director of Sales, Canada *Please note my email has changed:* mvijayan@TheKey.com TheKey.ca [image: TheKey] On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 9:14=E2=80=AFPM Steve Koyanagi wrote: > Matt, > > Per our discussion below, the attached includes a softer version of the > non-solicitation provision, which is now characterized in section 7(b) as= a > placement fee. This can potentially be used in Quebec. > > After you review, let me know if you'd like to discuss. > > Thanks. > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 10:50=E2=80=AFAM Lorena Ybarra > wrote: > >> Thanks for the clarification Timothy! >> >> On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 1:46=E2=80=AFPM Timothy Thomas w= rote: >> >>> 6 month non compete is legally allowed as per our CNESST (labour board) >>> Staffing permit in Quebec. But after the 6 months they can leave withou= t >>> penalty / or placement fee. >>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 12:31=E2=80=AFPM Steve Koyanagi >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Sure; I can work on that. To clarify, do you want to have a separate >>>> version just for Quebec or are you thinking you want a softer version = for >>>> all of Canada? >>>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 9:19=E2=80=AFAM Matt Vijayan >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thank you Steve. >>>>> >>>>> Great advice on the context and/or talking track. Can we modify this >>>>> clause to soften the language on non-solicitation for Quebec, along t= he >>>>> same line as below? It appears that this clause, as it is, is creatin= g >>>>> confusion and reluctance in signing the agreement in general, across = CHLSD >>>>> (nursing homes) and SLCs. >>>>> >>>>> Matt Vijayan, B.Sc., MBA, CCPE >>>>> >>>>> Director of Sales, Canada >>>>> >>>>> *Please note my email has changed:* >>>>> mvijayan@TheKey.com >>>>> >>>>> TheKey.com >>>>> [image: TheKey] >>>>> >>>>> On Apr 19, 2023, at 11:44 AM, Steve Koyanagi >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> =EF=BB=BF >>>>> Yes; this is a business decision if we want to delete in order to get >>>>> a deal done. We should just be aware of the risk of the Community poa= ching >>>>> our CG's and be ready to terminate the business relationship in the e= vent >>>>> we see too much of it. >>>>> >>>>> One quick comment/distinction. Technically, we're not prohibiting the >>>>> CG from actually working elsewhere, but merely requesting a placement= fee >>>>> from the community in the event the community wants to hire our CG. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 5:50=E2=80=AFAM Matt Vijayan >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Agreed. We have modified this clause with Schlegel Villages in >>>>>> Ontario as well. Let=E2=80=99s get the contract signed. >>>>>> >>>>>> Copying our corporate lawyer, Steve, and senior management. >>>>>> >>>>>> Matt Vijayan, B.Sc., MBA, CCPE >>>>>> >>>>>> Director of Sales, Canada >>>>>> >>>>>> *Please note my email has changed:* >>>>>> mvijayan@