Re: Community agreement

From
Steve Koyanagi <skoyanagi@thekey.com>
To
Lorena Ybarra <lorena.ybarra@thekey.com>
CC
Timothy Thomas <tt@thekey.com>, Matt Vijayan <mvijayan@thekey.com>, Matthew Neal <mneal@thekey.com>, Ashley Mirone <amirone@thekey.com>
Date
Thu, 20 Apr 2023 18:14:33 -0700
Folder
INBOX
--000000000000f2666105f9ce61ab Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f2665e05f9ce61a9" --000000000000f2665e05f9ce61a9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Matt, Per our discussion below, the attached includes a softer version of the non-solicitation provision, which is now characterized in section 7(b) as a placement fee. This can potentially be used in Quebec. After you review, let me know if you'd like to discuss. Thanks. On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 10:50=E2=80=AFAM Lorena Ybarra wrote: > Thanks for the clarification Timothy! > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 1:46=E2=80=AFPM Timothy Thomas wr= ote: > >> 6 month non compete is legally allowed as per our CNESST (labour board) >> Staffing permit in Quebec. But after the 6 months they can leave without >> penalty / or placement fee. >> On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 12:31=E2=80=AFPM Steve Koyanagi >> wrote: >> >>> Sure; I can work on that. To clarify, do you want to have a separate >>> version just for Quebec or are you thinking you want a softer version f= or >>> all of Canada? >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 9:19=E2=80=AFAM Matt Vijayan >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Thank you Steve. >>>> >>>> Great advice on the context and/or talking track. Can we modify this >>>> clause to soften the language on non-solicitation for Quebec, along th= e >>>> same line as below? It appears that this clause, as it is, is creating >>>> confusion and reluctance in signing the agreement in general, across C= HLSD >>>> (nursing homes) and SLCs. >>>> >>>> Matt Vijayan, B.Sc., MBA, CCPE >>>> >>>> Director of Sales, Canada >>>> >>>> *Please note my email has changed:* >>>> mvijayan@TheKey.com >>>> >>>> TheKey.com >>>> [image: TheKey] >>>> >>>> On Apr 19, 2023, at 11:44 AM, Steve Koyanagi >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> =EF=BB=BF >>>> Yes; this is a business decision if we want to delete in order to get = a >>>> deal done. We should just be aware of the risk of the Community poachi= ng >>>> our CG's and be ready to terminate the business relationship in the ev= ent >>>> we see too much of it. >>>> >>>> One quick comment/distinction. Technically, we're not prohibiting the >>>> CG from actually working elsewhere, but merely requesting a placement = fee >>>> from the community in the event the community wants to hire our CG. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 5:50=E2=80=AFAM Matt Vijayan >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Agreed. We have modified this clause with Schlegel Villages in Ontari= o >>>>> as well. Let=E2=80=99s get the contract signed. >>>>> >>>>> Copying our corporate lawyer, Steve, and senior management. >>>>> >>>>> Matt Vijayan, B.Sc., MBA, CCPE >>>>> >>>>> Director of Sales, Canada >>>>> >>>>> *Please note my email has changed:* >>>>> mvijayan@TheKey.com >>>>> >>>>> TheKey.com >>>>> [image: TheKey] >>>>> >>>>> On Apr 19, 2023, at 8:45 AM, Lorena Ybarra >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> =EF=BB=BF >>>>> Good morning Matt and Tim, >>>>> >>>>> Communities are not agreeing to this section of the con

Thread (4)