--000000000000458a0005f9b2f579 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sure; I can work on that. To clarify, do you want to have a separate version just for Quebec or are you thinking you want a softer version for all of Canada? On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 9:19=E2=80=AFAM Matt Vijayan = wrote: > Thank you Steve. > > Great advice on the context and/or talking track. Can we modify this > clause to soften the language on non-solicitation for Quebec, along the > same line as below? It appears that this clause, as it is, is creating > confusion and reluctance in signing the agreement in general, across CHLS= D > (nursing homes) and SLCs. > > Matt Vijayan, B.Sc., MBA, CCPE > > Director of Sales, Canada > > *Please note my email has changed:* > mvijayan@TheKey.com > > TheKey.com > [image: TheKey] > > On Apr 19, 2023, at 11:44 AM, Steve Koyanagi wrote= : > > =EF=BB=BF > Yes; this is a business decision if we want to delete in order to get a > deal done. We should just be aware of the risk of the Community poaching > our CG's and be ready to terminate the business relationship in the event > we see too much of it. > > One quick comment/distinction. Technically, we're not prohibiting the CG > from actually working elsewhere, but merely requesting a placement fee fr= om > the community in the event the community wants to hire our CG. > > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 5:50=E2=80=AFAM Matt Vijayan wrote: > >> Agreed. We have modified this clause with Schlegel Villages in Ontario a= s >> well. Let=E2=80=99s get the contract signed. >> >> Copying our corporate lawyer, Steve, and senior management. >> >> Matt Vijayan, B.Sc., MBA, CCPE >> >> Director of Sales, Canada >> >> *Please note my email has changed:* >> mvijayan@TheKey.com >> >> TheKey.com >> [image: TheKey] >> >> On Apr 19, 2023, at 8:45 AM, Lorena Ybarra >> wrote: >> >> =EF=BB=BF >> Good morning Matt and Tim, >> >> Communities are not agreeing to this section of the contract; it is >> illegal in Quebec to prohibit someone from working elsewhere. It is not >> well seen in the industrie. I have sent two contracts to private CHSLD a= nd >> they are not signing because of this. >> >> Can we change the term period and placement fee. >> >> Thanks >> >> >> Non=E2=80=93Solicitation. Community and Company understand that each sp= ends a >> significant amount of time, money and resources in the process of >> recruiting, screening, hiring and training its employees and therefore e= ach >> employee is a valuable asset. During the Term and for a period of one >> (1) year thereafter, neither Party shall directly or indirectly solicit, >> induce, encourage, or attempt to solicit, induce, or encourage any emplo= yee >> of the other Party to leave or terminate its relationship with the other >> Party. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, neit= her >> Party shall be prohibited from employing any such person who (i) respond= s >> to any general advertisements or