--Apple-Mail-89DB2231-A6D6-4682-80B6-53E6673671B2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thank you Steve. G= reat advice on the context and/or talking track. Can we modify this clause t= o soften the language on non-solicitation for Quebec, along the same line as= below? It appears that this clause, as it is, is creating confusion and rel= uctance in signing the agreement in general, across CHLSD (nursing homes) an= d SLCs. Matt Vijayan, B.Sc., MBA, CCPE = Director of Sales, Canada Please note my email has changed: = mvijayan@TheKey.com TheKey.com On Ap= r 19, 2023, at 11:44 AM, Steve Koyanagi <skoyanagi@thekey.com> wrote: =EF=BB=BF= Yes; this is a business decision if we wan= t to delete in order to get a deal done. We should just be aware of the risk= of the Community poaching our CG's and be ready to terminate the business r= elationship in the event we see too much of it. One quick= comment/distinction. Technically, we're not prohibiting the CG from actuall= y working elsewhere, but merely requesting a placement fee from the communit= y in the event the community wants to hire our CG. On= Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 5:50=E2=80=AFAM Matt Vijayan < mvijayan@thekey.com > wrote: Agreed. We have modified= this clause with Schlegel Villages in Ontario as well. Let=E2=80=99s get th= e contract signed. Copying our corporate lawyer, St= eve, and senior management. Matt Vijayan, B.Sc., MBA, CCPE = Director of Sales, Canada Please note my email has changed: mvijayan@TheKey.= com <t