--000000000000546810062d83bb87 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm hesitant to confuse the situation, especially internationally. Would prefer to keep it clean and move forward as we aligned. *Derek Gordon* COO | *TheKey* 310-402-9968 [image: TheKey] On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 6:43=E2=80=AFPM Michele Boehmer wrote: > I did not realize that we have 90 days. In speaking with Sharon, we woul= d > love a chance to bring all 4 on and evaluate over the 90 day period and > then decide who to keep. Do we have strong objections to this direction? > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 4:12=E2=80=AFPM Timothy Thomas wro= te: > >> Michelle and I just connected and I=E2=80=99m supportive of the plan. >> >> I recommend we include language re: 3 month probationary period in the >> employment contract as this allows us to terminate without cause in Cana= da. >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 5:59=E2=80=AFPM Emily Russell >> wrote: >> >>> As long as Nina is good with it, so am I. :-) >>> >>> Just need to work through offer letter, tracking etc. once we land on a >>> path forward. >>> >>> >>> >>> *Emily Russell* >>> SVP Human Resources | *TheKey* >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 5:46=E2=80=AFPM Michele Boehmer >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Emily. >>>> >>>> Nina, Derek and I met a few minutes ago and we are thinking of bringin= g >>>> on 1 CSM (salaried) and 1 scheduler (hourly) and then bringing the oth= er 2 >>>> into a transitional consultant role (like a contractor or a salaried t= emp >>>> position). I am connecting with Timothy and Sharon to make sure we ar= e >>>> aligned on the team members to keep. Do you have any concerns about >>>> proceeding this way? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 3:41=E2=80=AFPM Emily Russell >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Nina- >>>>> >>>>> Can we offer them salaried temp positions (duration of 60 days) so we >>>>> don=E2=80=99t have to walk down the path of position eliminations / s= everance? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *Emily Russell* >>>>> SVP Human Resources | *TheKey* >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 5:02=E2=80=AFPM Michele Boehmer >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> As this is time sensitive, I wanted to get this to the top of your >>>>>> inbox. These 4 individuals have been working this week to help with = the >>>>>> transition with the understanding that they will be compensated by u= s. Can >>>>>> we regroup on how we will proceed? I'd like to give them some answe= rs and >>>>>> we really need them for this transition. Let me know what works for >>>>>> everyone to connect. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> Michele >>>>>> >>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>>>>> From: Michele Boehmer >>>>>> Date: Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 10:15=E2=80=AFAM >>>>>> Subject: Re: Victoria - Temp Employees >>>>>> To: Nina Kani >>>>>> Cc: Emily Russell , Melissa Reyes >>>>> melissa.reyes@thekey.com> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> After further work with the 4 employees of Victoria and working with >>>>>> Sharon on the transition, I am