--0000000000000ff154062d82a497 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I did not realize that we have 90 days. In speaking with Sharon, we would love a chance to bring all 4 on and evaluate over the 90 day period and then decide who to keep. Do we have strong objections to this direction? On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 4:12=E2=80=AFPM Timothy Thomas wrote= : > Michelle and I just connected and I=E2=80=99m supportive of the plan. > > I recommend we include language re: 3 month probationary period in the > employment contract as this allows us to terminate without cause in Canad= a. > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 5:59=E2=80=AFPM Emily Russell > wrote: > >> As long as Nina is good with it, so am I. :-) >> >> Just need to work through offer letter, tracking etc. once we land on a >> path forward. >> >> >> >> *Emily Russell* >> SVP Human Resources | *TheKey* >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 5:46=E2=80=AFPM Michele Boehmer >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Emily. >>> >>> Nina, Derek and I met a few minutes ago and we are thinking of bringing >>> on 1 CSM (salaried) and 1 scheduler (hourly) and then bringing the othe= r 2 >>> into a transitional consultant role (like a contractor or a salaried te= mp >>> position). I am connecting with Timothy and Sharon to make sure we are >>> aligned on the team members to keep. Do you have any concerns about >>> proceeding this way? >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 3:41=E2=80=AFPM Emily Russell >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Nina- >>>> >>>> Can we offer them salaried temp positions (duration of 60 days) so we >>>> don=E2=80=99t have to walk down the path of position eliminations / se= verance? >>>> >>>> >>>> *Emily Russell* >>>> SVP Human Resources | *TheKey* >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 5:02=E2=80=AFPM Michele Boehmer >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> As this is time sensitive, I wanted to get this to the top of your >>>>> inbox. These 4 individuals have been working this week to help with t= he >>>>> transition with the understanding that they will be compensated by us= . Can >>>>> we regroup on how we will proceed? I'd like to give them some answer= s and >>>>> we really need them for this transition. Let me know what works for >>>>> everyone to connect. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> Michele >>>>> >>>>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>>>> From: Michele Boehmer >>>>> Date: Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 10:15=E2=80=AFAM >>>>> Subject: Re: Victoria - Temp Employees >>>>> To: Nina Kani >>>>> Cc: Emily Russell , Melissa Reyes >>>> melissa.reyes@thekey.com> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> After further work with the 4 employees of Victoria and working with >>>>> Sharon on the transition, I am concerned about this solution. 3 of t= he 4 >>>>> are currently exempt and having them as hourly employees, even short = term, >>>>> will be cost prohibitive. While I understand that we are not looking= to >>>>> commit long term to these team members, Can we bring them on as regul= ar >>>>> employees like we have done with past acquisiti