--000000000000b6f7eb0638032d22 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b6f7ea0638032d21" --000000000000b6f7ea0638032d21 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Steve, I sure will. Do we want to make that change to all Canadian CCAs so they're consistent? Thank you, Tammi Franzese Senior Corporate Paralegal | TheKey Mobile: 813.521.5269 On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 11:44=E2=80=AFAM Steve Koyanagi wrote: > Good on my end. Tammi, can you work with Pandadoc and Shawntel as needed? > > > > On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 1:23=E2=80=AFPM Shawntel Sousa wrote: > >> Hi, >> This is what I was also thinking. >> >> *Respectfully, * >> >> *Shawntel Sousa, LPN* >> >> Client Success Manager | TheKey >> >> Mobile: 403-305-6588 Office: 403-301-3777 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 2:21=E2=80=AFPM Tammi Franzese >> wrote: >> >>> Would it help if we add something to the current signature block that >>> makes it clear where to sign? The first line is meant to be a signature >>> line. We could revise it to say Signature of Client or Authorized Agent= . >>> I'm thinking it would be helpful to have a Printed Name line underneath= the >>> signature line since it's often difficult to read the signature and tha= t >>> can be especially difficult when it's someone other than the client >>> signing. Then we can move "Self or Relationship to Client" to the right >>> box. >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> [image: image.png] >>> >>> Thank you, >>> >>> Tammi Franzese >>> >>> Senior Corporate Paralegal | TheKey >>> >>> Mobile: 813.521.5269 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 3:27=E2=80=AFPM Timothy Thomas = wrote: >>> >>>> I was curious about her comment on the signature box. >>>> >>>> "There is a box for them to print their name but not signature, our >>>> agreements are the same. There=E2=80=99s a box to either print or sign= but >>>> shouldn=E2=80=99t it be both. It=E2=80=99s not always the client signi= ng. I could be >>>> wrong." >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 3:26=E2=80=AFPM Steve Koyanagi >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> So these addendums are incorporated into the underlying agreement lik= e >>>>> Tim says, which does have the client name. >>>>> >>>>> Shawntel, can you explain why we need it again? >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 12:23=E2=80=AFPM Timothy Thomas wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> See attached >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 3:07=E2=80=AFPM Steve Koyanagi >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Shawntel, can you attach what you're looking at? Perhaps we can >>>>>>> organize a quick call to discuss? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 11:43=E2=80=AFAM Timothy Thomas >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> @Steve Koyanagi thoughts on Shawntels >>>>>>>> comment below? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 2:28=E2=80=AFPM Shawntel Sousa >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I understand, we just give it with our regular agreement not >>>>>>>>> separately. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> There is a box for them to print their n