--0000000000007f9da90638034c3e Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007f9da80638034c3d" --0000000000007f9da80638034c3d Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Good with me. Tim before implementing the change we will want to make sure your teams are all aware. On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 9:16=E2=80=AFAM Tammi Franzese wrote: > Hi Steve, > > I sure will. Do we want to make that change to all Canadian CCAs so > they're consistent? > > Thank you, > > Tammi Franzese > > Senior Corporate Paralegal | TheKey > > Mobile: 813.521.5269 > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 11:44=E2=80=AFAM Steve Koyanagi > wrote: > >> Good on my end. Tammi, can you work with Pandadoc and Shawntel as needed= ? >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 1:23=E2=80=AFPM Shawntel Sousa wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> This is what I was also thinking. >>> >>> *Respectfully, * >>> >>> *Shawntel Sousa, LPN* >>> >>> Client Success Manager | TheKey >>> >>> Mobile: 403-305-6588 Office: 403-301-3777 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 2:21=E2=80=AFPM Tammi Franzese >> tammi.franzese@thekey.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Would it help if we add something to the current signature block that >>>> makes it clear where to sign? The first line is meant to be a signatur= e >>>> line. We could revise it to say Signature of Client or Authorized Agen= t. >>>> I'm thinking it would be helpful to have a Printed Name line underneat= h the >>>> signature line since it's often difficult to read the signature and th= at >>>> can be especially difficult when it's someone other than the client >>>> signing. Then we can move "Self or Relationship to Client" to the righ= t >>>> box. >>>> >>>> Thoughts? >>>> >>>> [image: image.png] >>>> >>>> Thank you, >>>> >>>> Tammi Franzese >>>> >>>> Senior Corporate Paralegal | TheKey >>>> >>>> Mobile: 813.521.5269 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 3:27=E2=80=AFPM Timothy Thomas = wrote: >>>> >>>>> I was curious about her comment on the signature box. >>>>> >>>>> "There is a box for them to print their name but not signature, our >>>>> agreements are the same. There=E2=80=99s a box to either print or sig= n but >>>>> shouldn=E2=80=99t it be both. It=E2=80=99s not always the client sign= ing. I could be >>>>> wrong." >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 3:26=E2=80=AFPM Steve Koyanagi >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> So these addendums are incorporated into the underlying agreement >>>>>> like Tim says, which does have the client name. >>>>>> >>>>>> Shawntel, can you explain why we need it again? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 12:23=E2=80=AFPM Timothy Thomas >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> See attached >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 3:07=E2=80=AFPM Steve Koyanagi >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Shawntel, can you attach what you're looking at? Perhaps we can >>>>>>>> organize a quick call to discuss? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 11:43=E2=80=AFAM Timothy Thomas >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>