Re: Upcoming Termination - Liz Hamilton (Canada)

From
Kathryn Nester <knester@thekey.com>
To
Timothy Thomas <tt@thekey.com>
CC
Christopher Reese <christopher.reese@thekey.com>, Cristal Munoz <cmunoz@thekey.com>, Erika Holtman <erika.holtman@thekey.com>, Andrea Goble <andrea.goble@thekey.com>
Date
Wed, 29 Jan 2025 16:08:50 -0500
Folder
INBOX
--000000000000491e4d062cdeb869 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm waiting on a document from legal that will be provided to Liz upon termination, outlining the separation information. I will forward this as soon as I have it. Irin with Canada Payroll will also need to be looped in so that she can process final pay and notice pay accordingly. Thanks, Kathryn On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 3:55=E2=80=AFPM Timothy Thomas wrot= e: > Understood. I support proceeding with basic entitlements. > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 3:47=E2=80=AFPM Kathryn Nester wrote: > >> Hi Tim, >> >> Attached is what is outlined in her employment agreement. She is entitle= d >> to 2 weeks notice, any vacation accruals, benefits are still applicable >> during the notice period. >> >> This may change if she challenges it. >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 3:31=E2=80=AFPM Timothy Thomas w= rote: >> >>> Kathryn, What do the basic entitlements look like? >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 3:00=E2=80=AFPM Christopher Reese >> christopher.reese@thekey.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Yes, I would agree >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 11:55=E2=80=AFAM Cristal Munoz >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Ok thank you! I think we are good to proceed. @Christopher Reese >>>>> do you agree with the below? >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> Cristal >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 2:53=E2=80=AFPM Kathryn Nester >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Cristal, >>>>>> >>>>>> We can still backfill the position as this is not a lay off and she >>>>>> is being paid out for the termination. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Kathryn >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 2:44=E2=80=AFPM Cristal Munoz >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Kathryn, >>>>>>> Thanks for the information. Question for you - If we go this route, >>>>>>> what does backfilling Liz look like? Any implications? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>> Cristal >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 2:40=E2=80=AFPM Kathryn Nester >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Cristal, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We can move forward with termination for Liz but it will be a >>>>>>>> non-cause termination. Legal is going to forward me something for = this as >>>>>>>> well that will be provided to Liz. We will start with her basic >>>>>>>> entitlements but it's possible that she may come back and negotiat= e for >>>>>>>> more, to which Legal thinks we would land somewhere around 3 month= s >>>>>>>> severance. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> Kathryn >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 5:27=E2=80=AFPM Cristal Munoz >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Kathryn, >>>>>>>>> That makes sense. Keep me posted if it's a meeting I >>>>>>>>> should be joining. Unfortunately, we don't think we can wait anot= her 30 >>>>>>>>> days for the PIP and the Regional Director overseeing Canada woul= d also >>>>>>>>> like to have Liz terminated as soon as possible. I have also atta= ched Liz's >>>>>>>>> goals to this email in case that's helpful. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>> 

Thread (1)