--00000000000099d91a060e98a72a Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Tim, I just want to clarify the colour coding on the maps. Presumably, the red areas are excluded and blue areas we are targeting. However, there are several affluent neighbourhoods that have no shading (South Vancouver immediately comes to mind). Does this mean we are not going after these areas? Thanks, Dennis Fancy, BSP Care Solutions Manager TheKey.ca [image: TheKey] On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 2:06=E2=80=AFPM Timothy Thomas wrote= : > Hi guys, > > Here is the updated targeting map from Google Adwords, based on the > feedback you provided. Could you take a quick look to make sure it square= s > with your feedback. > > Blue zones are targeted, red zones are excluded. > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: Arshdeep Brar > Date: Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 12:47=E2=80=AFPM > Subject: Re: Vancouver Targeting Update > To: Alexa Graziani , Timothy Thomas > Cc: Patrick Zehnder , John McColman john@infrontmarketing.ca> > > > Hey Alexa, > > > This has been implemented. > Here is the new map; I have also added it to the December report and our > Google sheet for future reference. Thanks! > > *Ash Brar* > > In Front Marketing > > Results Driven Performance Marketing > > > > 587.969.7574 > > *ash@infrontmarketing.ca * > > Suite 401 =E2=80=93 255 17 Ave SW, Calgary, AB > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Alexa Graziani > *Sent:* Friday, January 5, 2024 5:15 PM > *To:* Timothy Thomas > *Cc:* Arshdeep Brar ; Patrick Zehnder patrick@infrontmarketing.ca>; John McColman > *Subject:* Re: Vancouver Targeting Update > > Hi Ash, > > Next week, can you please send an updated map that removes the ones in > orange but keeps the ones in green? You can see the team's feedback for > reference. > > V7B (area of Richmond by airport-eliminate)- for sure its just not our > demographic > V7C, (Richmond-we have a big client here so probably worth keeping) yes > some very high end apartment blocks there and we have had great success > before > V6Y, (Richmond-we can service so yes) agree > V7E, (Steveston in Richmond-keep) agree but we have never had much luck > there > V6W, (Richmond retail areas, farmland-eliminate) agree > V3V, (Newton in Surrey-eliminate)agree > V5A, > V3B, (tough area of Coquitlam to service-eliminate) agree > V3C, (Port Coquitlam-eliminate) for sure too far > V4N, (Fleetwood and Clayton in Surrey, Langley-maybe worth keeping?) > Cathy really thinks we should keep > V2X, (Maple Ridge-eliminate) for sure although we get a fair number of > calls but its really hard to staff > V2Z, (Langley Township-huge territory perhaps an opportunity (lots of > seniors homes) yes again can be difficult to staff BUT if we could grow > there we can hire for there > V4P, (White Rock-keep) agree > V4B, (White Rock-keep)agree > V7V, (West Vancouver-keep)agree > V7W, (West Vancouver-keep)agree > V6P, (Vancouver South-keep)agree > V5Z, (Oakridge, VCH i