Re: Add Counties to Illinois License

From
Sean Cygan <scygan@thekey.com>
To
Emily Swackhamer <emily.swackhamer@thekey.com>
CC
Amanda Fults <amanda.fults@thekey.com>, Timothy Thomas <tt@thekey.com>, Diane Mockenhaupt <dmockenhaupt@thekey.com>, Audra Williams <audraw@thekey.com>
Date
Mon, 25 Nov 2024 12:33:17 -0800
Folder
INBOX
--00000000000038807e0627c2a5c4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Team, I still need the following information. Sean - The reason for the expansion request (i.e. currently receiving requests for service in that county). On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 11:45=E2=80=AFAM Sean Cygan wro= te: > Ok, thank you. > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 11:43=E2=80=AFAM Emily Swackhamer emily.swackhamer@thekey.com> wrote: > >> These are the originally requested counties: >> >> >> - Madison >> - St. Clair >> - Monroe >> - Clinton >> - Washington >> - Bond >> - Jersey >> >> >> In order to make each county contiguous to the current counties on the >> license we would need to add: >> >> >> - Livingston >> - Woodford >> - Tazewell >> - Mason >> - Cass >> - Morgan >> - Macoupin >> >> >> Thank you, >> Emily >> >> On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 1:36=E2=80=AFPM Amanda Fults >> wrote: >> >>> Thanks so much Emily! >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 1:08=E2=80=AFPM Emily Swackhamer >> emily.swackhamer@thekey.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Thank you! You will have it shortly! >>>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 1:00=E2=80=AFPM Amanda Fults >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Team, >>>>> Just following up on the counties list. We would like to get the >>>>> application to the state ASAP. Thanks so much! >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 10:53=E2=80=AFAM Amanda Fults >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Ok will do, not sure it will work but we will cross our fingers! Can >>>>>> you send the full list of counties please? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 10:45=E2=80=AFAM Timothy Thomas >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Got it, please proceed with option 1. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 11:29=E2=80=AFAM Amanda Fults >>>>>> amanda.fults@thekey.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Tim, >>>>>>>> My recommendation would be to try the 1st option. If we decide to >>>>>>>> apply for a new license we would need to take the following >>>>>>>> into consideration: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Separate Office Location: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If the second license is for a different geographic service area o= r >>>>>>>> office location, IDPH will >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> require proof that the new location operates independently from th= e >>>>>>>> first. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Distinct Operations: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Each licensed location must comply independently with IDPH >>>>>>>> regulations, including separate: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Staff rosters, >>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Administrator or supervisor oversight, >>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Policies and procedures specific to the new location. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No Duplicate Licensing for Same Location: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> IDPH generally does not allow two separate licenses for the same >>>>>>>> location unless there is a >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> clear distinction in services offered (e.g., home services vs. hom= e >>>>>>>> nursing). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Agency Name Considerations: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> While the entity name 

Thread (2)