Re: Add Counties to Illinois License

--000000000000f1ae8c0627c2b542 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yes, we are currently receiving requests for service in multiple counties. On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 2:33=E2=80=AFPM Sean Cygan wrot= e: > Hi Team, > > I still need the following information. Sean > > > - > > The reason for the expansion request (i.e. currently receiving > requests for service in > > that county). > > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 11:45=E2=80=AFAM Sean Cygan w= rote: > >> Ok, thank you. >> >> On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 11:43=E2=80=AFAM Emily Swackhamer > emily.swackhamer@thekey.com> wrote: >> >>> These are the originally requested counties: >>> >>> >>> - Madison >>> - St. Clair >>> - Monroe >>> - Clinton >>> - Washington >>> - Bond >>> - Jersey >>> >>> >>> In order to make each county contiguous to the current counties on the >>> license we would need to add: >>> >>> >>> - Livingston >>> - Woodford >>> - Tazewell >>> - Mason >>> - Cass >>> - Morgan >>> - Macoupin >>> >>> >>> Thank you, >>> Emily >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 1:36=E2=80=AFPM Amanda Fults >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks so much Emily! >>>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 1:08=E2=80=AFPM Emily Swackhamer >>> emily.swackhamer@thekey.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thank you! You will have it shortly! >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 1:00=E2=80=AFPM Amanda Fults >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Team, >>>>>> Just following up on the counties list. We would like to get the >>>>>> application to the state ASAP. Thanks so much! >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 10:53=E2=80=AFAM Amanda Fults >>>>> amanda.fults@thekey.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Ok will do, not sure it will work but we will cross our fingers! Ca= n >>>>>>> you send the full list of counties please? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 10:45=E2=80=AFAM Timothy Thomas >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Got it, please proceed with option 1. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thank you! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 11:29=E2=80=AFAM Amanda Fults >>>>>>> amanda.fults@thekey.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Tim, >>>>>>>>> My recommendation would be to try the 1st option. If we decide to >>>>>>>>> apply for a new license we would need to take the following >>>>>>>>> into consideration: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Separate Office Location: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If the second license is for a different geographic service area >>>>>>>>> or office location, IDPH will >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> require proof that the new location operates independently from >>>>>>>>> the first. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Distinct Operations: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Each licensed location must comply independently with IDPH >>>>>>>>> regulations, including separate: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Staff rosters, >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Administrator or supervisor oversight, >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Policies and procedures specific to the new location. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> No Duplicate Licensing for Same Location: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> IDPH gen