Re: Portsmouth v. Home Care Assistance (Draft)
- From
- Charles Terlesky <cterlesky@homecareassistance.com>
- To
- Steve Koyanagi <skoyanagi@thekey.com>
- CC
- Timothy Thomas <tt@thekey.com>
- Date
- Thu, 26 Jan 2023 20:22:45 -0700
- Folder
- INBOX
--000000000000bcf99d05f33661de Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable We will work on this tomorrow morning so you have all of the information you need. Thanks, Chuck On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 8:16 PM Steve Koyanagi wrote= : > Thanks. I can respond to her directly, asking for her to provide any lega= l > authority that communications have to go through an attorney when it is a > current employee. That is a rather ridiculous position in my view. > > Can you also please provide as many details as you can underlying the > written warning? Is it just related to the privatization issue? Can someo= ne > put together a specific timeline of all events that were the reasons for > the written warning? > > Those factual details will also help me with my email to her counsel. > > Thanks. > > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 6:54 PM Charles Terlesky cterlesky@homecareassistance.com> wrote: > >> Hi Steve: Here is the response from the lawyer. I just copied and pasted >> this here for you as to not accidently respond to the original email. >> >> Let me know the next steps. >> >> Regards, >> Chuck >> >> >> Hello Mr. Chuck Terlesky, >> >> >> You should understand that once a lawyer informs you that they have been >> retained, you are required to only communicate with the lawyer. You cann= ot >> communicate with that lawyer=E2=80=99s client. It does not matter that s= he is your >> employee or not. It is especially so when there are potential employment >> disputes with legal ramifications. >> >> >> In regards to potential employment disputes, you sent a letter to my >> client with specific allegations. She needs clarity regarding those >> allegations, and that is the substance of the letter we sent to you on >> January 23 2023. >> >> >> Added to the above, my client has never provided a letter of resignation= . >> What has happened is that my client=E2=80=99s case manager wrote a lette= r >> threatening my client. >> >> >> My client does not understand the substance of that letter. Before she >> signs the letter or attends to any phone calls from you, she needs clari= ty >> regarding the threats in that letter. As you are well aware, there are >> financial consequences if it is established that she has breached her >> employment contract. >> >> >> In order to keep the relationship amicable, and to resolve any issues >> that are yet unknown to my client, my client wishes that you clarify you= r >> letter of January 13 2023. >> >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Valerie Muguoh Chiatoh, Ph.D. >> Barrister & Solicitor >> >> -- >> Chuck Terlesky B.A., CCPE >> General Manager/Regional Caregiver Ambassador for Canada >> Home Care Assistance Calgary >> Home Care Assistance Winnipeg >> Office Calgary: 403-301-3777 >> Office Winnipeg: 204-489-6000 >> 37 Richard Way SW, Unit 305 >> >> Calgary, AB. T3E 7M8 >> >> >> HomeCareAssistanceCalgary.ca >> HCAWinnipeg.ca >> Click Here For Information >> --- >> Read Our Testimonials >> Join Our Newsletter >
Thread (4)
- Re: Portsmouth v. Home Care Assistance (Draft)Fri, 27 Jan 2023 09:33:57 -0700
Charles Terlesky
- Re: Portsmouth v. Home Care Assistance (Draft)Fri, 27 Jan 2023 09:33:57 -0700
Charles Terlesky
- Re: Portsmouth v. Home Care Assistance (Draft)Thu, 26 Jan 2023 19:16:47 -0800
Steve Koyanagi
- Re: Portsmouth v. Home Care Assistance (Draft)Thu, 26 Jan 2023 19:16:47 -0800
Steve Koyanagi