Re: Planning for Gagandeep Kaur - Return to Work from Maternity Leave

--0000000000007c446c063a733bdb Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I think Gagandeep will be working M/T/W - Let me confirm with Shyanne what works best for her schedule. Chuck On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 9:26=E2=80=AFAM Sharon Speirs = wrote: > I dont think Gagandeeps hours affect Vancouver as she is only coming back > for Weekends? Shyanne does Vancouver Monday night, Tuesday night and > Wednesday night- is that affected? > Sharon > > Sharon, Speirs > > General Manager > > Vancouver, BC > > Office: 778.279.3634 > > sspeirs@thekey.com > > TheKey.ca > > [image: TheKey] > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 8:56=E2=80=AFAM Chuck Terlesky (Home Care Assista= nce) cterlesky@thekey.com> wrote: > >> I believe Shyanne had to sign a new agreement for her position, but that >> would=E2=80=99ve been done by HR, not me. I can ask her if she has any >> documentation on her position as on-call. >> >> I=E2=80=99ll speak with Shyanne and let you know how it goes. For Shyann= e to have >> her hours cut back, she would have to let some of Vancouver go. I=E2=80= =99m not >> sure how Sharon would feel about that. Sharon, can you comment you could >> have Gagandeep trained for Vancouver? >> >> Chuck >> >> >> Chuck Terlesky B.A., CCPE >> General Manager >> Calgary, Alberta >> >> Office Calgary: 403-301-3777 >> >> >> --- >> >> >> >> TheKey.ca >> >> [image: TheKey] >> >> On Jul 21, 2025, at 6:51=E2=80=AFAM, Kathryn Nester = wrote: >> >> =EF=BB=BF >> Is Shyanne under an employment agreement for so many hours / days? Also >> does anyone have a copy of her updated agreement / job description for >> on-call. The only thing in her workday file is for staffing and CGM. >> >> Thanks, >> Kathryn >> >> On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 9:37=E2=80=AFAM Timothy Thomas w= rote: >> >>> Thanks Kathryn, >>> >>> Chuck, can you speak with Shyanne and let her know that we will need to >>> cut back her hours and work Gagandeep back into the rotation. Let me kn= ow >>> how it goes. >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 11:57=E2=80=AFAM Kathryn Nester >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Team, >>>> >>>> We are obligated to give Gagandeep back her role or one of equal work >>>> and value - I would not advise changing her pay structure upon her ret= urn - >>>> you could potentially get around this if it amounts to the same or gre= ater >>>> pay. >>>> >>>> If separation is being considered I would not advise doing this >>>> immediately upon her return as it could be viewed as retaliatory. I wo= uld >>>> recommend reviewing budget, performance, structure etc. over 60-90 day= s >>>> following her return in order to make an objective and informed decisi= on. I >>>> will consult with our legal team on what may be considered the least r= isky >>>> paths forward for a separation. >>>> >>>> I agree that it may make the most sense to have Gagandeep take over on= e >>>> office/area specifically. I know she was part time but what days/times= was >>>> she working previously? >>>> >>>>