----==_mimepart_660ad4226db4f_1d03f90c70e71203412108e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Tim, Have you had a chance to give this some thought on how you'd lik= e to proceed? Thanks,=C2=A0 Mark Warner = = On Fri, 29 Mar at 4:52 PM , Mark Warner wrote:= = = Hi Phil, = After our conversation today, the "preference" was to create two new 905= numbers; however, considering 8x8 and Callrail have no 905 numbers avail= able, we'll need to go with plan B. =C2=A0We can certainly repurpose the = 905 Toronto number, but it appears we're not going to get another 905 num= ber. =C2=A0So, with that, I leave it to Tim determine the next move as my= role in this isn't affected either way. = = Tim, do we repurpose the current 905 number and create a new 289 number = ... or ... do we create two new 289 numbers? =C2=A0Not sure if there is a= need/desire for area consistency or not? =C2=A0Otherwise, functionally, = there will be no difference. = = = Thanks,=C2=A0 = Mark Warner = = = = = = On Fri, 29 Mar at 4:04 PM , TheKey Support wro= te: = Mark, can we repurpose the 905 8x8 # in toronto=C2=A0if it is not being = used? = = = = = On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 4:02=E2=80=AFPM Timothy Thomas w= rote: = = = Not ideal but 289 is the next best=C2=A0option =C2=A0 = Tim Thomas = Head of Canada Division = Please note my email has changed: = tt@TheKey.com = (514) 591-9387 = = TheKey.ca = = = = = = = On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 2:10=E2=80=AFPM Mark Warner wrote: = = = = = = And, of course, 8x8 has no 905 area code numbers available.=C2=A0 We hav= e 289 and 365 numbers available.=C2=A0 Preference? = = Thanks,=C2=A0 = Mark Warner = = = = = = = = = On Fri, 29 Mar at 12:05 PM , Alexa Graziani wro= te: Works for me! Agreed. Thanks, Mark.=C2=A0 ----==_mimepart_660ad4226db4f_1d03f90c70e71203412108e Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Tim, Have you had a chance to give this some thought on how y= ou'd like to proceed? Thanks,=C2=A0 Mark Warner On Fri, 29 Mar at 4:52 PM , Mark Warner <= itsupport@thekey.com> wrote: Hi Phil, After our conversation today, the "preference" was to cr= eate two new 905 numbers; however, considering 8x8 and Callrail have no 9= 05 numbers available, we'll need to go with plan B. =C2=A0We can certainl= y repurpose the 905 Toronto number, but it appears we're not going to get= another 905 number. =C2=A0So, with that, I leave it to Tim determine the= next move as my role in this isn't affected either way. Tim, do we repurpose the current 905 number and create a= new 289 number ... or ... do we create two new 289 numbers? =C2=A0Not su= re if there is a need/desire for area consistency or not? =C2=A0Otherwise= , functionally, there will be no difference. Thanks,=C2=A0 Mark Warner On Fri, 29 Mar at 4:04 PM , TheKey Support &= lt;itsupport@thekey.com> wrote: Mark, can we repurpo