--000000000000dc813f060d088f2c Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000dc813e060d088f2b" --000000000000dc813e060d088f2b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ash, Chuck said you nailed it on the map! Great work! One change "to the west, there is an (#8) on the road. Right below Pirmez Creek. This whole area is the rich of the rich - move the Bragg Creek radius over to this location and increase the size of the radius." Please make that change, send me the proposed map, and then I'll approve it to go live. Thanks, On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 4:02=E2=80=AFPM Alexa Graziani wrote: > Thank you! I will connect with Chuck and Tim on this. > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 3:41=E2=80=AFPM Arshdeep Brar > wrote: > >> hi Alexa, >> >> Thanks for clarifying that here is an updated map, I believe this is wha= t >> you are looking for: >> We don't have designated smaller postal code regions on the very top, so >> I wont be able to exclude that, we cannot use radius targeting in exclus= ion >> so that also limits us >> According to this map link underneath, T3K should cover the region but >> in ads interface, it doesn't: >> Calgary Postal Code Map (maptrove.ca) >> >> >> >> >> >> The postal codes to be excluded will be: >> T3N >> T3J >> T3P >> T1Y >> T2A >> T2E >> T2B >> T3K >> T3R >> T1Z >> >> Thanks, >> Ash >> >> *Ash Brar* >> >> In Front Marketing >> >> Results Driven Performance Marketing >> >> >> >> 587.969.7574 >> >> *ash@infrontmarketing.ca * >> >> Suite 401 =E2=80=93 255 17 Ave SW, Calgary, AB >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* Alexa Graziani >> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 20, 2023 1:40 PM >> *To:* Arshdeep Brar >> *Cc:* John McColman ; Patrick Zehnder > patrick@infrontmarketing.ca>; Timothy Thomas >> *Subject:* Re: Calgary Targeting Update >> >> Hi Ash, >> >> Thank you for the clarification. >> >> I have two concerns with this map: >> >> 1. The screenshot of what Chuck recommends we remove from the main >> campaign goes all the way down to that second section jutting out on = the >> right hand side. For the most part, it doesn't seem like we're curren= tly >> targeting that area. Based on that I drew in red areas in Calgary it = seems >> like we'd want to exclude it moving forward. Is that possible? >> 2. The northernmost section above the 201 seems to all be under 44. >> It also looks like we aren't targeting there currently so it seems li= ke we >> wouldn't want to target there either >> >> >> Mostly, it looks like we want to open up that central/southern area. >> >> Also, do you have any concerns about us eliminating the northwestern or >> southeastern sections we are currently targeting? It seems like the new >> Calgary targeting likely gets the best part of those postal codes but >> wanted to check. >> >> Once we have the map in a place we like, I'll connect with Tim and Chuck >> to get final approval/feedback. >> >> Areas of concern: >> [image: SCR-20231220-hcr.png] >> >>