--0000000000009f9317064a942492 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks Donny and Sarah. All reporting in 2026 should have these sites combined! We have been combining them manually for many months for incentive calculations and 2026 Financial Targets. On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 1:02=E2=80=AFPM Timothy Thomas wrot= e: > Hi Sarah, > > I will advocate to Chris this Friday that we begin winding down the GR > operation. We're not onboarding any new clients and revenue & EBITDA is > consistently declining. The Chicago team should not be penalized for this > negative impact in their comp plan. > > > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 12:45=E2=80=AFPM Sarah Powers wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I'm hoping to get clarity on how we are treating Grand Rapids and Chicag= o >> for reporting, particularly around incentives. In the targets received s= o >> far, I see Grand Rapids and Chicago are combined. Should these be combin= ed >> in all areas of reporting? >> >> For any reporting where we track against a target, if targets are >> combined we will need to combine the sites in tableau. >> >> So I guess my questions are >> a) are we treating them as one for targets? >> b) if yes, is there a reason we wouldn't combine the sites for all >> reporting, but still be able to keep separate offices as the layer deepe= r >> than the site? >> >> Thanks, >> Sarah >> >> -- >> Sarah Powers >> Director, Strategic Analytics >> TheKey.com >> [image: TheKey] >> > --0000000000009f9317064a942492 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks Donny and Sarah.=C2=A0 All reporting in 2026 should= have these sites combined!=C2=A0 We have been combining them manually for = many months for incentive calculations and 2026 Financial Targets. = On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 1:02= =E2=80=AFPM Timothy Thomas < tt@thekey.c= om > wrote: Hi Sarah, I will advocate to Chris th= is Friday that we begin winding down the GR operation. We're not onboar= ding any new clients and revenue & EBITDA is consistently declining. Th= e Chicago team should not be penalized for this negative=C2=A0impact in the= ir=C2=A0comp plan. On Wed, Feb 11, 2026= at 12:45=E2=80=AFPM Sarah Powers < spowers@thekey.com > wrote: Hi All, I'm hoping to get clarity on how we are treating Grand= Rapids and Chicago for reporting, particularly around incentives. In the t= argets received so far, I see Grand Rapids and Chicago are combined. Should= these be combined in all areas of reporting? For = any reporting=C2=A0where we track against a target, if=C2=A0targets are com= bined we will need to combine the sites in tableau.=C2=A0 So I guess my questions are=C2=A0 a) are we treating them= as one for targets? b) if yes, is there a reason we wouldn't= combine the sites for all reporting, but still be able to keep separate of= fices as the layer deeper than the site? Thanks, Sarah -- Sarah Powers Director, Strategic Analytics <a hre