--000000000000ca88e5064bab0d76 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi All, Bringing this topic up again. Tim shared that Chris approved winding down Grand Rapids. I know the incentives and targets have been combined. Joel - when creating the month-over-month increase for Chicago/Grand Rapids, were these sites combined and growing together? Or did you have a different rate for Grand Rapids and Chicago? Happy to set up time to think through how this should be best represented. Thanks, Sarah On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 2:46=E2=80=AFPM Robert Valliant wrote: > Thanks Donny and Sarah. All reporting in 2026 should have these sites > combined! We have been combining them manually for many months for > incentive calculations and 2026 Financial Targets. > > > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 1:02=E2=80=AFPM Timothy Thomas wr= ote: > >> Hi Sarah, >> >> I will advocate to Chris this Friday that we begin winding down the GR >> operation. We're not onboarding any new clients and revenue & EBITDA is >> consistently declining. The Chicago team should not be penalized for thi= s >> negative impact in their comp plan. >> >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 12:45=E2=80=AFPM Sarah Powers wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I'm hoping to get clarity on how we are treating Grand Rapids and >>> Chicago for reporting, particularly around incentives. In the targets >>> received so far, I see Grand Rapids and Chicago are combined. Should th= ese >>> be combined in all areas of reporting? >>> >>> For any reporting where we track against a target, if targets are >>> combined we will need to combine the sites in tableau. >>> >>> So I guess my questions are >>> a) are we treating them as one for targets? >>> b) if yes, is there a reason we wouldn't combine the sites for all >>> reporting, but still be able to keep separate offices as the layer deep= er >>> than the site? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Sarah >>> >>> -- >>> Sarah Powers >>> Director, Strategic Analytics >>> TheKey.com >>> [image: TheKey] >>> >> --000000000000ca88e5064bab0d76 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi All, Bringing this topic up again. T= im shared that Chris approved winding down Grand Rapids. I know the incenti= ves and targets have been combined. Joel - when creating the month-over-mon= th increase for Chicago/Grand Rapids, were these sites combined and growing= together? Or did you have a different rate for Grand Rapids and Chicago? H= appy to set up time to think through how this should be best represented. Thanks, Sarah On Wed,= Feb 11, 2026 at 2:46=E2=80=AFPM Robert Valliant < bob.valliant@thekey.com > wrote: Thanks Donny a= nd Sarah.=C2=A0 All reporting in 2026 should have these sites combined!=C2= =A0 We have been combining them manually for many months for incentive calc= ulations and 2026 Financial Targets. On We= d, Feb 11, 2026 at 1:02=E2=80=AFPM Timothy Thomas < tt@thekey.com > wrote: Hi Sarah, I will advo