--000000000000ccab65064bab74c5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I had different growth rates for both sites, they are two distinct sites so ultimately if we just stop combining their results we can isolate just chicago performance vs GR performance On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 12:31=E2=80=AFPM Sarah Powers = wrote: > Hi All, > > Bringing this topic up again. Tim shared that Chris approved winding down > Grand Rapids. I know the incentives and targets have been combined. Joel = - > when creating the month-over-month increase for Chicago/Grand Rapids, wer= e > these sites combined and growing together? Or did you have a different ra= te > for Grand Rapids and Chicago? Happy to set up time to think through how > this should be best represented. > > Thanks, > Sarah > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 2:46=E2=80=AFPM Robert Valliant > wrote: > >> Thanks Donny and Sarah. All reporting in 2026 should have these sites >> combined! We have been combining them manually for many months for >> incentive calculations and 2026 Financial Targets. >> >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 1:02=E2=80=AFPM Timothy Thomas w= rote: >> >>> Hi Sarah, >>> >>> I will advocate to Chris this Friday that we begin winding down the GR >>> operation. We're not onboarding any new clients and revenue & EBITDA is >>> consistently declining. The Chicago team should not be penalized for th= is >>> negative impact in their comp plan. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 12:45=E2=80=AFPM Sarah Powers >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> I'm hoping to get clarity on how we are treating Grand Rapids and >>>> Chicago for reporting, particularly around incentives. In the targets >>>> received so far, I see Grand Rapids and Chicago are combined. Should t= hese >>>> be combined in all areas of reporting? >>>> >>>> For any reporting where we track against a target, if targets are >>>> combined we will need to combine the sites in tableau. >>>> >>>> So I guess my questions are >>>> a) are we treating them as one for targets? >>>> b) if yes, is there a reason we wouldn't combine the sites for all >>>> reporting, but still be able to keep separate offices as the layer dee= per >>>> than the site? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Sarah >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Sarah Powers >>>> Director, Strategic Analytics >>>> TheKey.com >>>> [image: TheKey] >>>> >>> --=20 Thanks, *Joel Reyes* Manager, Financial Operations --000000000000ccab65064bab74c5 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I had different growth rates for both sites, they are two = distinct sites so ultimately if we just stop combining their results we can= isolate just chicago performance vs GR performance On= Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 12:31=E2=80=AFPM Sarah Powers < spowers@thekey.com > wrote: Hi All, Bringing this topic up again. Tim shared that Chris approved winding = down Grand Rapids. I know the incentives and targets have been combined. Jo= el - when creating the m