--000000000000a3ca16062d813c60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable As this is time sensitive, I wanted to get this to the top of your inbox. These 4 individuals have been working this week to help with the transition with the understanding that they will be compensated by us. Can we regroup on how we will proceed? I'd like to give them some answers and we really need them for this transition. Let me know what works for everyone to connect. Thanks Michele ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Michele Boehmer Date: Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 10:15=E2=80=AFAM Subject: Re: Victoria - Temp Employees To: Nina Kani Cc: Emily Russell , Melissa Reyes After further work with the 4 employees of Victoria and working with Sharon on the transition, I am concerned about this solution. 3 of the 4 are currently exempt and having them as hourly employees, even short term, will be cost prohibitive. While I understand that we are not looking to commit long term to these team members, Can we bring them on as regular employees like we have done with past acquisitions and then make staff adjustments over time as needed? Please let me know if you have time to discuss as we need to move quickly Thanks Michele On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 2:41=E2=80=AFPM Nina Kani wrote: > OK, if they are hired hourly, they will need to track their hours and be > paid per hour for the work performed (not certain if their hourly rate is > different for caregiving vs. office work), including overtime for hours > worked beyond a standard workweek. Hourly employees can be full-time or > part-time, and they may be eligible for benefits like paid holidays and > overtime pay and of course they have to be paid for the minimum wage in t= he > providence of British Columbia. Beyond that, I don't see a reason why the= y > cannot be hired as either PT or FT. > > On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 1:30=E2=80=AFPM Michele Boehmer > wrote: > >> Not really set hours, more on deliverables. Working remotely and >> possibly a couple of caregiving shifts >> >> On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 1:22=E2=80=AFPM Nina Kani wrot= e: >> >>> Would they be hired as part time hourly, would they have set hours? >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 11:09=E2=80=AFAM Michele Boehmer >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Thank you for the consideration. There are 4 employees, 3 currently >>>> salaried and 1 hourly. I believe we would want to handle all 4 as PRN = in >>>> the short term as we evaluate >>>> >>>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 11:06=E2=80=AFAM Emily Russell >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Nina- >>>>> >>>>> We have three salaried employees in Victoria. We only need one of the= m >>>>> long term, but the remaining two are needed to help with the transiti= on. >>>>> >>>>> Do you have any concerns with us extending a salaried offer to the on= e >>>>> we want to retain, and then hiring the other two in hourly/PRN roles = with >>>>> possibly an incentive of some sort to work through X date to help wit= h the >>>>> transition? >>>>> >