--000000000000cd6898062df4cf17 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks, Kathryn. I have a couple of quick thoughts. On the background check deduction if we're not doing it anywhere else in Canada should we standardize and not do it for Quebec? Can you remind me why this is a historical practice only in Quebec? On the non-solicitation, the penalty is unenforceable so perhaps we're okay leaving it as is. Tim/Joey, thoughts on that one? I believe we strategically deleted it previously. Another big picture question is are we always doing an offer letter first then sending an employment agreement? What is our standard HR process in Canada? On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 8:48=E2=80=AFAM Kathryn Nester = wrote: > Hi All, > > I can get these updated so long as you are okay with the verbiage steve? > > Just to clarify, is the solicitation clause for the employment agreement, > and the background check information is for the offer letter? Is that rig= ht? > > Thank you, > Kathryn > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 11:42=E2=80=AFAM Steve Koyanagi > wrote: > >> Looping in Kathryn from HR as this is within HR's purview. >> >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> From: Timothy Thomas >> Date: Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 6:44=E2=80=AFAM >> Subject: Fwd: Missing Info on Contract >> To: Steve Koyanagi , Joey Taylor > joey.taylor@thekey.com> >> >> >> GM gents, >> >> Could you please get together to iron out and address Melissa's concerns >> with our MTL documentation? >> >> Thanks! >> >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> From: Melissa Rus >> Date: Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 9:41=E2=80=AFAM >> Subject: Missing Info on Contract >> To: Timothy Thomas >> Cc: Joey Taylor >> >> >> Hi Tim, >> >> I have 2 concerns regarding the caregiver offer letter. >> >> I emailed a few months ago about there being no mention of the $25 >> deduction fee for the employee background check in the offer letter. Thi= s >> issue only relates to Montreal since no other Canadian market does it. >> However, we ran into a problem with it since we didn't disclose it at th= e >> beginning. I've attached the background check mention of both the old an= d >> new contracts below. >> >> The second concern is about the non-solicitation section. On the old >> contract, it mentioned the specific penalty about what would happen if t= hey >> "stole" one of our clients. The current contract does not mention this, >> only that it is not allowed but no mention of consequences. >> I've attached the non-solicitation section from both the current one and >> the old HCA one. >> >> Please let me know if there's anything to be done so we can covered in >> case more problems come up. >> Thank you, >> >> -- >> >> Melissa Rus >> >> *Recruteur / Recruiter * >> >> *_________________* >> >> TheKey- Soins =C3=A0 Domicile: Montr=C3=A9al, QC >> >> Daughterly Companions: Pennsylvania >> >> Alpine HomeCare: Pennsylvania >> >> >> Tel: 514.907.5065 ext: 4 >> >> mrus@thekey.com | >> TheKey.