--000000000000ef8a0c062cedbf93 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Cristal, Absolutely. Does 11am EST work for you? On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 9:51=E2=80=AFAM Cristal Munoz w= rote: > Received. Thanks, Kathryn. Can we connect tomorrow to talk through talkin= g > points for Monday? I want to ensure I handle the conversation appropriate= ly. > > Best, > Cristal > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 9:44=E2=80=AFAM Kathryn Nester wrote: > >> Hi Cristal, >> >> Attached is Liz's termination letter. There is a spot on the bottom of >> the document for you to sign. This will need to be emailed to Liz follow= ing >> the termination conversation on February 3rd, it can also be added to >> Workday. >> >> Thank you, >> Kathryn >> >> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 4:45=E2=80=AFPM Cristal Munoz wrote: >> >>> Noted. Thank you, Kathryn! >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 4:09=E2=80=AFPM Kathryn Nester >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I'm waiting on a document from legal that will be provided to Liz upon >>>> termination, outlining the separation information. I will forward this= as >>>> soon as I have it. >>>> >>>> Irin with Canada Payroll will also need to be looped in so that she ca= n >>>> process final pay and notice pay accordingly. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Kathryn >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 3:55=E2=80=AFPM Timothy Thomas = wrote: >>>> >>>>> Understood. I support proceeding with basic entitlements. >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 3:47=E2=80=AFPM Kathryn Nester >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Tim, >>>>>> >>>>>> Attached is what is outlined in her employment agreement. She is >>>>>> entitled to 2 weeks notice, any vacation accruals, benefits are stil= l >>>>>> applicable during the notice period. >>>>>> >>>>>> This may change if she challenges it. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 3:31=E2=80=AFPM Timothy Thomas wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Kathryn, What do the basic entitlements look like? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 3:00=E2=80=AFPM Christopher Reese >>>>>> christopher.reese@thekey.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yes, I would agree >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 11:55=E2=80=AFAM Cristal Munoz >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ok thank you! I think we are good to proceed. @Christopher Reese >>>>>>>>> do you agree with the below? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>> Cristal >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 2:53=E2=80=AFPM Kathryn Nester >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Cristal, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> We can still backfill the position as this is not a lay off and >>>>>>>>>> she is being paid out for the termination. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>> Kathryn >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 2:44=E2=80=AFPM Cristal Munoz >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Kathryn, >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the information. Question for you - If we go >>>>>>>>>>> this route, what does backfilling Liz look like? Any implicatio= ns? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>>>> Cristal >