--000000000000ad9e0005fe926337 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks, everyone. My assumption is that we're 90% there with this policy as far as compliance, but there are likely a few technical items in each province that we need to account for. As mentioned by Jennifer, if rolling it out this week is a top priority we should do so. We have the option to concurrently have outside counsel review if we want to assess additional compliance concerns. I'd estimate the review would take an additional 2-3 weeks and likely cost 3-5k for a thorough review. Happy to discuss further. On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 9:20=E2=80=AFAM Angie Markwell wrote: > How long a delay and how much to use outside counsel? > > Sent from Angie's iPhone > > On Jun 20, 2023, at 11:51 AM, Timothy Thomas wrote: > > =EF=BB=BF > Personally I don't see any legal issues with this policy as it was built > upon previous franchise policies that were already reviewed by council. > Ultimately Steve's call. > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 11:48=E2=80=AFAM Jennifer Allen wrote: > >> Hi Angie, >> >> Yes, from the comments I do see she did review the original version. The >> big differences are: >> >> - Moved from weekly to daily time allotments >> - Allowing for people to use time (as approved by leadership) after >> the 90 day probationary period >> - Requiring a "1 week (5 day)" rollover year over year >> - Rolled Nova Scotia employees into a higher accrual for the 6%/3 >> weeks if they get to 5 years (previously 8 years until they would hav= e been >> eligible for those amounts. >> >> Jennifer >> >> On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 6:07=E2=80=AFAM Angie Markwell >> wrote: >> >>> Let me ask did Shameema review this way back when we started through th= e >>> process? >>> >>> Sent from Angie's iPhone >>> >>> On Jun 19, 2023, at 7:43 PM, Jennifer Allen wrote: >>> >>> =EF=BB=BF >>> Hi Angie and Tim, >>> >>> Alina and I shared the final communication plan and vacation policy wit= h >>> Steve K. in legal. His recommendation would be to have outside counsel = take >>> a look at the policy as a legal specialist in each province did not rev= iew >>> the document to ensure that we are 100% compliant and to ensure there i= s >>> not a risk to the company that may have been overlooked. I honestly tho= ught >>> the previous group supporting the implementation had looped in Steve pr= ior >>> for his initial thoughts; I take full responsibility for this callout s= o >>> late in the process. >>> >>> We can still move forward with Wednesday's launch, however, I did want >>> to make you aware of Steve's thoughts. >>> >>> *Angie/Tim*, based on the resources you would like to invest in this >>> policy, would you like Steve and I to have the policy reviewed with >>> external specialist legal consultants? >>> >>> Jennifer A. >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 10:51=E2=80=AFAM Angie Markwell >> angie.markwell@thekey.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Perfect - sorry had another engagement. >>>