Re: Question - Kansas City

From
Mansi Mehta <mmehta@thekey.com>
To
Amanda Fults <amanda.fults@thekey.com>
CC
Analissa Sanchez <analissa.sanchez@thekey.com>, Steve Koyanagi <skoyanagi@thekey.com>, Timothy Thomas <tt@thekey.com>
Date
Mon, 11 Nov 2024 11:26:01 -0800
Folder
INBOX
--0000000000002b560e0626a81308 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Amanda, You are correct, this language already exists in the offer letter. @Timothy Thomas - If a caregiver=E2=80=99s background check= is cleared, our team can push candidates through the process, even if the Reference Check (RC) and Employment Verification (EV) are still pending. Typically, a criminal background check has a turnaround time (TAT) of 1 day, but RC and EV can take up to 4.6 days. This timeframe can be influenced by several factors, including: - *Incorrect information provided by the candidate:* Inaccurate or incomplete information can delay the verification process. - *Timely Response from POCs:* Prompt responses from the reference and employment verification points of contact (POCs) can significantly reduc= e the turnaround time. - *Candidate Information:* The accuracy and completeness of information provided by the candidate, including contact details and previous employment history, is crucial. Accurate continues to make 4 attempts within 5 days for Reference Checks and Employment Verification. On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 8:38=E2=80=AFAM Amanda Fults wrote: > I believe this language was supposed to already be added to the offer > letter or possibly the welcome letter in iCIMS before Jenn left. It shoul= d > say something to the affect of "employment contingent on background check= " > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 9:54=E2=80=AFAM Mansi Mehta wr= ote: > >> Hello all, >> >> I think adding that language to the caregiver offer letter should be >> fine, but I'll loop in @Steve Koyanagi to confirm >> that it won't cause any legal issues. >> >> On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 3:26=E2=80=AFPM Analissa Sanchez > analissa.sanchez@thekey.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Tim! Adding Amanda and Mansi for their consult. >>> >>> On Nov 7, 2024, at 2:57=E2=80=AFPM, Timothy Thomas wrot= e: >>> >>> =EF=BB=BF >>> Hi Analissa, >>> >>> Could you please take a look at Teresa's email below. We're trying to >>> find a way to get our CGs to work faster. We may need language added to= the >>> offer letter. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>> From: Teresa Heit >>> Date: Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 3:33=E2=80=AFPM >>> Subject: Question >>> To: Timothy Thomas >>> >>> >>> Tim, >>> I've combed through all of the regulations twice and don't see where >>> they talk about provisional employment pending the KDADS check in terms= of >>> what would need to be in their offer letter. However, unless I'm readin= g >>> this wrong, it does still say we can hire them on a provisional basis f= or >>> 60 days pending the results (see below). I'm hoping someone in recruiti= ng >>> could help with what a provisional offer would need to say and if we al= low >>> it as a company. It would help get our caregivers out in the field fast= er >>> as it's taking much longer to get the results back. >>> >>> >>> >>> 8) a copy of the eligibility determination request submit

Thread (2)