--000000000000a42e2c062cddc284 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yes, I would agree On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 11:55=E2=80=AFAM Cristal Munoz = wrote: > Ok thank you! I think we are good to proceed. @Christopher Reese > do you agree with the below? > > Best, > Cristal > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 2:53=E2=80=AFPM Kathryn Nester wrote: > >> Hi Cristal, >> >> We can still backfill the position as this is not a lay off and she is >> being paid out for the termination. >> >> Thanks, >> Kathryn >> >> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 2:44=E2=80=AFPM Cristal Munoz wrote: >> >>> Hi Kathryn, >>> Thanks for the information. Question for you - If we go this route, wha= t >>> does backfilling Liz look like? Any implications? >>> >>> Best, >>> Cristal >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 2:40=E2=80=AFPM Kathryn Nester >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Cristal, >>>> >>>> We can move forward with termination for Liz but it will be a non-caus= e >>>> termination. Legal is going to forward me something for this as well t= hat >>>> will be provided to Liz. We will start with her basic entitlements but= it's >>>> possible that she may come back and negotiate for more, to which Legal >>>> thinks we would land somewhere around 3 months severance. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Kathryn >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 5:27=E2=80=AFPM Cristal Munoz >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Kathryn, >>>>> That makes sense. Keep me posted if it's a meeting I >>>>> should be joining. Unfortunately, we don't think we can wait another = 30 >>>>> days for the PIP and the Regional Director overseeing Canada would al= so >>>>> like to have Liz terminated as soon as possible. I have also attached= Liz's >>>>> goals to this email in case that's helpful. >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> Cristal >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 5:23=E2=80=AFPM Kathryn Nester >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Cristal, >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd like to run this by our Canadian legal team first. I appreciate >>>>>> the documentation and it looks like there have been several coaching= calls, >>>>>> it doesn't seem like there is any corrective actions or PIP that wou= ld >>>>>> indicate she is at risk of losing her job if performance doesn't cha= nge. I >>>>>> think we would be required to provide notice / pay in lieu of here. >>>>>> >>>>>> Have we considered putting her on a PIP first? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Kathryn >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 5:02=E2=80=AFPM Erika Holtman >>>>> erika.holtman@thekey.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Cristal, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am looping in Andrea and Kathryn who oversee the Canadian team. I= t >>>>>>> is likely that they will need to schedule time with our legal count= erpart >>>>>>> in Canada for a final review, but they will be able to share with y= ou the >>>>>>> next steps. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you for sending all of the documentation over for review. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Erika Holtman, PHR* >>>>>>> HR Manager - West Division >>>>>>> erika.holtman@thekey.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>>