Re: FW: Janet Yount - Coat Damage- Insurance Coverage

--00000000000081371c0618702689 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Gerard, See below note in the tracker Legal Collections Matters tab. Janet Young POC Brechin Chaplin Unit #1 - 365 George Street N., Cambridge, Ontario N1S 1A7 Canada Demand Letter 5/8/24: Sent first demand per Liz's request via registered mail. Reply due 5/15 5/8/24: Sent first demand per Liz's request via registered mail. Reply due 5/15 I'll send the second demand this week if there's no response. Thank you, *Tammi Franzese* Senior Corporate Paralegal | *TheKey*813.521.5269 [image: TheKey] On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 11:00=E2=80=AFAM wrote: > Tammi, > > > > Good morning. Please move forward with the Demand Letter for Janet Young > by the close of business today. We had given her until the end of the wee= k > to make payment and that did not happen. Please let me know if there is > anything that you need from me to put the letter together. Thank you. > > > > Gerard > > > > *From:* Tammi Franzese > *Sent:* Tuesday, May 7, 2024 11:27 AM > *To:* eclark@thekey.com > *Cc:* gerard.draetta@thekey.com; Michelle Hudgins michelle.hudgins@thekey.com> > *Subject:* Re: FW: Janet Yount - Coat Damage- Insurance Coverage > > > > Good Morning Liz, > > > > You got it. I'll update the tracker and create a folder too. > > > > Best, > > *Tammi Franzese* > > Senior Corporate Paralegal | > *TheKey*813.521.5269 > [image: TheKey] > > > > > > On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 7:44=E2=80=AFAM wrote: > > Hi Tammi- > > > > Can we draft a demand letter to send to this client, please? It=E2=80=99s= below > our typical amount but Laszlo would like us to pursue at least the letter > and see how it goes. > > > > Elizabeth Clark > > Director > > > > > > > > *From:* Laszlo Kovacs > *Sent:* Monday, May 6, 2024 5:01 PM > *To:* eclark@thekey.com > *Subject:* Re: Janet Yount - Coat Damage- Insurance Coverage > > > > I=E2=80=99d support it. > > > > On May 6, 2024, at 5:28=E2=80=AFPM, eclark@thekey.com wrote: > > =EF=BB=BF > > I don=E2=80=99t disagree but they were on service for two weeks, and serv= ices > ended in 2023. We can have legal send a demand letter, if you=E2=80=99ll = support > the effort based on the amount? > > > > *From:* Laszlo Kovacs > *Sent:* Thursday, May 2, 2024 8:34 AM > *To:* eclark@thekey.com > *Subject:* RE: Janet Yount - Coat Damage- Insurance Coverage > > > > Hi Liz, > > > > Heard back from our PLP broker=E2=80=A6this does sound like it would be c= overed by > our policy, but only up to a value of $1K, and that=E2=80=99s not even co= nsidering > our deductible. Would suggest we do not pursue this through our PLP > coverage. Also, the below details from Cherly sound to me like a money gr= ab > by this client. If it were me, I=E2=80=99d tell them since the coat was i= n the > laundry basket the CG aced in a way that was reasonable and we feel there > is no fault on our end. Just my two cents=E2=80=A6 > > > > Thanks, > > > > *From:* eclark@thekey.com > *Sent:*