--000000000000fc2bbb062ced77aa Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fc2bb8062ced77a8" --000000000000fc2bb8062ced77a8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Cristal, Attached is Liz's termination letter. There is a spot on the bottom of the document for you to sign. This will need to be emailed to Liz following the termination conversation on February 3rd, it can also be added to Workday. Thank you, Kathryn On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 4:45=E2=80=AFPM Cristal Munoz w= rote: > Noted. Thank you, Kathryn! > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 4:09=E2=80=AFPM Kathryn Nester wrote: > >> I'm waiting on a document from legal that will be provided to Liz upon >> termination, outlining the separation information. I will forward this a= s >> soon as I have it. >> >> Irin with Canada Payroll will also need to be looped in so that she can >> process final pay and notice pay accordingly. >> >> Thanks, >> Kathryn >> >> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 3:55=E2=80=AFPM Timothy Thomas w= rote: >> >>> Understood. I support proceeding with basic entitlements. >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 3:47=E2=80=AFPM Kathryn Nester >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Tim, >>>> >>>> Attached is what is outlined in her employment agreement. She is >>>> entitled to 2 weeks notice, any vacation accruals, benefits are still >>>> applicable during the notice period. >>>> >>>> This may change if she challenges it. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 3:31=E2=80=AFPM Timothy Thomas = wrote: >>>> >>>>> Kathryn, What do the basic entitlements look like? >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 3:00=E2=80=AFPM Christopher Reese >>>> christopher.reese@thekey.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Yes, I would agree >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 11:55=E2=80=AFAM Cristal Munoz >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Ok thank you! I think we are good to proceed. @Christopher Reese >>>>>>> do you agree with the below? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>> Cristal >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 2:53=E2=80=AFPM Kathryn Nester >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Cristal, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We can still backfill the position as this is not a lay off and sh= e >>>>>>>> is being paid out for the termination. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> Kathryn >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 2:44=E2=80=AFPM Cristal Munoz >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Kathryn, >>>>>>>>> Thanks for the information. Question for you - If we go >>>>>>>>> this route, what does backfilling Liz look like? Any implications= ? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>> Cristal >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 2:40=E2=80=AFPM Kathryn Nester >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Cristal, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> We can move forward with termination for Liz but it will be a >>>>>>>>>> non-cause termination. Legal is going to forward me something fo= r this as >>>>>>>>>> well that will be provided to Liz. We will start with her basic >>>>>>>>>> entitlements but it's possible that she may come ba