=?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Zoom_=2D_Enable_Voicemail_Deletion_=E2=80=93_Admin_Restr?= =?UTF-8?Q?iction_Issue_=2D_=5B=231244232=5D?=

From
Joey Taylor <joey.taylor@thekey.com>
To
Mark Warner <itsupport@thekey.com>
CC
tt@thekey.com
Date
2025-10-08 09:01:51
Folder
INBOX
--00000000000058a0100640a54a40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hey Mark, For Montreal, would I be able to get admin power to do this? Also, will voicemails eventually fill up a ring group once they reach a certain point and then no voicemails can be left? Thanks, On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 8:58=E2=80=AFAM Mark Warner w= rote: > Understood. Who all should have delete access to the ring groups? Zoom'= s > perspective on this is that anything going to a group voicemail should be > managed by a specific person (or persons) as it might be easy for no one = to > return calls as they might think someone else will do it ... or ... there > are those that will just hide behind voicemail, delete them, and not call > the caller back in order to avoid work. I know that sounds pretty > pessimistic, but there is a degree of truth to it which is why Zoom > designed their call queues that way. > > Anyway, with that, I just want to make sure we have you covered for the > degree of access you wish to grant people the ability to arbitrarily dele= te > group voicemails. > > Thanks, > Mark Warner > > > On Tue, 7 Oct at 6:32 PM , JosephTaylor joey.taylor@homecareassistance.com> wrote: > Hi Mark, > > Yes, I am referring to if someone calls lets say the "New Client Line", > and leaves a voicemail. If I call them back and speak to them, I should b= e > able to delete that VM even if its not coming to my personal line. We had > that power under 8x8. > > Thanks, > > On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 1:35=E2=80=AFPM Mark Warner = wrote: > >> There should be no reason you aren't able to delete your OWN voicemails >> left on your personal Zoom number. Currently, the system is not set up = to >> allow deletion of Call Queue (ring group) voicemails. Are these the >> voicemails to which you are referring? >> >> On Tue, 7 Oct at 1:10 PM , Mark Warner wrote: >> Sorry for the delay; just have had other issues that triaged with a touc= h >> higher priority. Looking at this now. >> =E2=80=8B >> >> >> On Mon, 6 Oct at 9:15 PM , JosephTaylor > joey.taylor@homecareassistance.com> wrote: >> Hey Mark, >> >> Yes, exactly!! >> >> > > -- > Joey Taylor > *Directeur G=C3=A9n=C3=A9ral/**General Manager* > 514-907-5065 > TheKey.ca > [image: TheKey] > > 1244232:611100 > --=20 Joey Taylor *Directeur G=C3=A9n=C3=A9ral/**General Manager* 514-907-5065 TheKey.ca [image: TheKey] --00000000000058a0100640a54a40 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hey Mark, For Montreal, would I be able to get admi= n power to do this? Also, will voicemails eventually fill up a ring grou= p once they reach a certain point and then no voicemails can be left? Thanks,=C2=A0 On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 8:58=E2=80=AFAM= Mark Warner &lt; itsupport@thekey.c= om &gt; wrote: Understood.=C2=A0 Who all should have delete access to the= ring groups?=C2=A0 Zoom&#39;s perspective on this is that anything going t= o a group voicemail should be managed by a

Thread (2)