--000000000000398ed4062875929d Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I understood that we would push forward and get it implemented asap but I'll get clarification. *Sincerely,* *Tammi Franzese* Senior Corporate Paralegal | *TheKey*tammi.franzese@thekey.com 813.521.5269 [image: TheKey] On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 11:52=E2=80=AFAM Timothy Thomas wrot= e: > Everything was clear. Thanks. > > I guess my final question is that if they=E2=80=99re unable to meet the J= an 1 > deadline are we still pushing forward or waiting until next year? > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 11:30=E2=80=AFAM Tammi Franzese > wrote: > >> Hi Tim, >> >> Did you get all your questions answered by Teio yesterday? Are there any >> action items for me on my end? >> >> *Sincerely,* >> >> *Tammi Franzese* >> Senior Corporate Paralegal | >> *TheKey*tammi.franzese@thekey.com >> 813.521.5269 >> [image: TheKey] >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 9:37=E2=80=AFAM Timothy Thomas wr= ote: >> >>> Hi Tammi, >>> >>> So we use SJD for all the private pay business and Arya Healthy Living >>> Inc. for our staffing business. This is the entity that also possesses = our >>> license to operate augmented staffing in Ontario. >>> >>> That raises another point. In Quebec, we have a temp agency license wit= h >>> the CNESST (workers comp board) which will need to be transferred to th= e >>> new parent company. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 5:19=E2=80=AFPM Tammi Franzese >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Tim, >>>> >>>> Our attorney is asking for more information to answer your question - >>>> >>>> As for Ontario, can you please confirm which entities Tim is speaking >>>> of? There are three Ontario entities: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> SJD Care Services Inc. >>>> >>>> Arya Healthy Living Inc. >>>> >>>> Arya Healthy Living Oakville Inc. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I am not familiar with how Tim is utilizing two companies to work >>>> around overtime regulations. If Tim requires two separate employer ent= ities >>>> to accomplish this, then we will need to leave one of the entities out= of >>>> the amalgamation. It would make sense to exclude the entity that condu= cts >>>> the business that the remaining subsidiaries do not conduct. Would thi= s be >>>> the augmented staffing business? >>>> >>>> >>>> I believe you said one of the entities is SJD. What is the other >>>> entity? >>>> >>>> Which entity does augmented staffing? our attorney thinks that is the >>>> entity that should not be included in the amalgamation if you want to >>>> continue as before re overtime. >>>> >>>> @Nina Kani Do you agree that the augmented >>>> staffing entity should not be included in the amalgamation? >>>> >>>> Thank you. >>>> >>>> *Sincerely,* >>>> >>>> *Tammi Franzese* >>>> Senior Corporate Paralegal | >>>> *TheKey*tammi.franzese@thekey.com >>>> 813.521.5269 >>>> [image: TheKey] >>>> >>> --000000000000398ed4062875929d Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printab